BREAKING SAD NEWS: Just 13 minutes ago in New York, it was confirmed that Savannah Guthrie
Police have just contacted Savannah Guthrie with a fragile update in the ongoing search for her missing mother, confirming that investigators have detected a brief, unexplained signal believed to be linked to her whereabouts. However, authorities stress that her exact location remains unknown, and she has not yet been found.
According to officials familiar with the investigation, the signal was picked up late last night during a routine sweep of regional communication frequencies. The transmission was described as weak, intermittent, and distressingly short, offering no clear coordinates but enough to suggest that her mother may still be alive.
Search teams were immediately redirected to re-examine several nearby areas connected to earlier leads. Despite hours of renewed effort, no physical trace of her has been discovered. The signal has not reappeared since.
Savannah Guthrie was reportedly informed directly by authorities in a private call. Those close to the family say she remains steadfast but visibly shaken, holding onto hope while bracing for uncertainty that has now stretched on for days.
Investigators caution the public against speculation, emphasizing that the case is still evolving. They confirmed that the direction of the search may change once again as analysts work to determine the origin and nature of the signal.
For now, the question that weighs heavily on everyone involved remains unanswered:
Where is she — and what does the signal truly mean?
Police say further updates will be released as soon as verified information becomes available.
Savannah Guthrie Opens Up About ‘Unthinkable’ Nightmares Haunting Her After Mother’s Abduction
In an emotional first TV interview since her mother’s abduction, Today Show host Savannah Guthrie shared the heartbreaking thoughts that plague her every night.
Speaking candidly with co-host Hoda Kotb, Savannah, 54, revealed the “unthinkable” terror that haunts her as she tries to navigate the agony of not knowing where her mother, Nancy Guthrie, is. “I wake up every night, in the middle of the night, and in the darkness, I imagine her terror,” Savannah confessed, visibly emotional.
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc():focal(738x334:740x336)/Savannah-Guthrie-Nancy-Guthrie-040526-2d9dd398bcc148d9a8b9b644e1afb5c3.jpg)
On February 1, 2026, the unthinkable happened—Nancy, 84, was taken from her Tucson, Arizona home in the early hours of the morning. Despite more than 50 days of investigation, there are still no leads and no suspects in what authorities call a truly chilling case.
Savannah, choking back tears, made an impassioned plea for anyone who might have information: “Someone needs to do the right thing. We are in agony. We are in agony. It is unbearable.” She voiced her desperation, hoping that someone would step forward to help bring Nancy home.
Hoda Kotb, who spoke with Savannah on-air, described the moment as “gut-wrenching,” remarking on her strength and grace amid unimaginable pain. “There’s a desperation and also a steeliness about Savannah,” Hoda noted, emphasizing how Savannah holds on to hope, despite the overwhelming uncertainty. “She’s hoping someone, anyone, will see something and speak up.”
The trauma is evident in Savannah’s words as she recalled the chilling details from the night her mother was taken. “It’s unthinkable, but those thoughts demand to be thought, and I will not hide in my face, but she needs to come home now,” Savannah said, her voice trembling with emotion.
Savannah’s family has also issued a heartfelt plea to the public, urging the community in Southern Arizona to review memories, security footage, and even personal records from the critical dates of January 11, January 31, and February 1—hoping even the smallest detail could spark a breakthrough.
“We cannot grieve; we can only ache and wonder,” Savannah added, revealing how the anguish continues to grip her. Despite the overwhelming uncertainty, a $1 million private reward still stands for anyone who provides information leading to Nancy’s safe return.
In the midst of the investigation, Savannah has stepped back from her hosting duties on The Today Show, but remains hopeful for a return to normalcy when things settle. “I crave a return to normalcy,” she shared with Hoda, as the support for her and her family grows stronger by the day.
TV Talk Shows
We can only hope for answers, and for Nancy Guthrie to be brought home.
Nearly 150,000 California Mail Ballots Rejected In Primary
California election officials are examining why nearly 150,000 mail-in ballots were rejected during the state’s June primary, with late-arriving ballots accounting for most of the increase.
The higher rejection rate comes despite years of election law changes designed to make voting more accessible and ensure more ballots are ultimately counted.
According to data compiled by the California Secretary of State’s office, 148,241 mail-in ballots were rejected during the June primary, representing 1.73% of all mail ballots returned.
That marks an increase from the 2024 primary, when 108,982 ballots were rejected, or 1.56% of all mail ballots cast.
The largest reason for rejection was ballots arriving too late to qualify under California law.
State data shows that 93,479 ballots were rejected because they failed to meet the state’s deadline requirements.
California allows mail ballots to arrive up to seven days after Election Day, provided they are postmarked on or before Election Day.
Voting experts believe many of the rejected ballots received postmarks dated after Election Day, making them ineligible to be counted even if they arrived within the seven-day grace period.
Kim Alexander, president of the nonpartisan California Voter Foundation, said the timing of postal processing appears to be a significant concern.
“Ballots rejected due to lateness are caused primarily to being postmarked too late to count, not because they arrived too late to count,” Alexander said.
Election experts have questioned whether recent operational changes within the U.S. Postal Service may be contributing to delayed postmarks.
Earlier this year, a group of mostly Democratic U.S. senators wrote to the Postal Service expressing concern that mail-processing changes could affect ballot handling during federal elections.
Updated Postal Service procedures mean postmarks may reflect when mail is processed at regional facilities rather than when it first enters the mail system.
Because processing centers have been consolidated in some areas, election officials have warned that postmark timing could be affected.
Before the June primary, California election officials encouraged voters to mail ballots as early as possible because of potential postal delays.
The June election also featured a highly competitive race for governor, which some experts believe encouraged many voters to wait until the final days before casting ballots.
In addition to late-arriving ballots, approximately 44,000 ballots were rejected because election officials determined the voter’s signature did not match the signature on file.
Another 8,300 ballots were rejected because the return envelope did not contain a signature.
State records also show that 743 ballots were rejected because those voters had already cast another ballot.
Other rejected ballots involved missing ballots inside return envelopes or multiple ballots submitted in a single envelope.
The highest rejection rate in the state occurred in Tulare County, where 3.52% of returned mail ballots were rejected.
Alpine County and Merced County followed closely, each recording rejection rates of 3.36%.
California has frequently faced criticism for taking weeks to complete vote counting after major elections, largely because state law permits ballots meeting certain requirements to continue arriving after Election Day.
Following the June primary, President Donald Trump again criticized California’s election system, while the Department of Justice opened an investigation into election administration in Los Angeles County.
Election experts emphasize that the increase in rejected ballots should not be interpreted as evidence of widespread voter fraud.
A 2025 report by the Brookings Institution found documented cases of mail ballot fraud remained extremely rare, estimating roughly four cases for every 10 million mail ballots cast, The Associated Press reported.
State officials have not identified evidence of widespread fraud connected to the June primary, but the increase in rejected ballots is expected to receive additional scrutiny as election administrators evaluate whether changes in postal operations, voter behavior or election procedures contributed to the higher rejection rate.
