Dem Sen. Adam Schiff Could Face Up To 20 Years in Jail and a Fine After New Emails Revealed, Some Allege Schiff Could Be in Trouble...
WASHINGTON, D.C. — April 21, 2026
Karma is coming fast and hard for the radical left’s biggest Trump-hating liar.
Former prosecutor and Fox News star Jeanine Pirro just dropped a bombshell: Democrat Senator Adam Schiff (D-CA) is facing potential arrest and devastating criminal charges that could send him to federal prison for up to 20 years plus massive fines.
A longtime Democrat whistleblower who worked for over a decade on the House Intelligence Committee has come forward with explosive allegations backed by declassified FBI interview reports. The whistleblower claims Schiff personally authorized the leaking of classified intelligence to the media during the Trump-Russia investigation with the explicit goal of damaging then-President Donald Trump and ultimately helping to “indict” him.
In an all-staff meeting, Schiff allegedly declared that his team would leak classified information “derogatory to President of the United States Donald J. Trump” to push the fake collusion narrative. When the whistleblower objected that the plan was “unethical and possibly treasonous,” he was told they “would not be caught.” He was later fired after reporting the scheme to the FBI.
The whistleblower also revealed that Schiff believed he had been promised the position of CIA Director if Hillary Clinton won in 2016. Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-CA) is alleged to have been a key conduit for the leaks.
Former U.S. Attorney Brett Tolman laid out the brutal reality on Benny Johnson’s show: leaking classified information carries fines up to $250,000 per count, and with conspiracy, interference with official proceedings, and other related statutes in play, Schiff could face up to 20 years in federal prison if prosecutors prove the leaks were intended to undermine the United States and sabotage a sitting president.
This is not a partisan spat. This is the heart of the Russia hoax — the biggest political scandal and cover-up in American history. Schiff, as ranking member and later chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, was at the center of pushing the Steele Dossier lies, the Crossfire Hurricane witch hunt, and years of baseless impeachment theater against President Trump.
President Donald Trump was right from the beginning. The entire Russia collusion narrative was a deliberate deep state operation cooked up by the Clinton campaign, Obama officials, and complicit media to destroy a duly elected president. Now, with FBI Director Kash Patel and Attorney General Pam Bondi in place, the real investigation is finally happening.
The radical left weaponized every institution against Trump — the FBI, CIA, DOJ, and Congress. They spied, leaked, lied, and tried to overthrow the will of the American people. Adam Schiff was one of the loudest cheerleaders and most dishonest actors in that coup attempt.
Jeanine Pirro is correct to call this potentially career-ending — and possibly prison-ending — news. Grand juries are reportedly weighing indictments. The American people have had enough of two-tiered justice. If Schiff broke the law by leaking classified information to damage Trump, he must face the same consequences any other American would face.
President Trump survived their endless witch hunts. He won in 2024 in a historic landslide. Now the deep state players who tried to destroy him are being exposed and held accountable.
The house of cards of the Russia hoax is collapsing. Every leaked memo, every whistleblower testimony, every declassified document brings us closer to full justice.
MAGA does not want revenge. We want the rule of law restored. No one — not even powerful Democrat senators — is above the law.
Adam Schiff spent years lying to the American people on national television. He called Trump a traitor, pushed the collusion hoax, and helped fuel years of national division. If the evidence shows he leaked classified information to achieve that, then prison is exactly where he belongs.
The radical left’s days of weaponizing government against conservatives are over. With Trump back in the White House and warriors like Kash Patel at the FBI, the reckoning has begun.
We are winning. Truth is winning. Justice is coming.
Let the investigations proceed. Let the truth come out. And let the American people finally see the full extent of the deep state’s treasonous plot against President Trump and this great nation.
Nearly 150,000 California Mail Ballots Rejected In Primary
California election officials are examining why nearly 150,000 mail-in ballots were rejected during the state’s June primary, with late-arriving ballots accounting for most of the increase.
The higher rejection rate comes despite years of election law changes designed to make voting more accessible and ensure more ballots are ultimately counted.
According to data compiled by the California Secretary of State’s office, 148,241 mail-in ballots were rejected during the June primary, representing 1.73% of all mail ballots returned.
That marks an increase from the 2024 primary, when 108,982 ballots were rejected, or 1.56% of all mail ballots cast.
The largest reason for rejection was ballots arriving too late to qualify under California law.
State data shows that 93,479 ballots were rejected because they failed to meet the state’s deadline requirements.
California allows mail ballots to arrive up to seven days after Election Day, provided they are postmarked on or before Election Day.
Voting experts believe many of the rejected ballots received postmarks dated after Election Day, making them ineligible to be counted even if they arrived within the seven-day grace period.
Kim Alexander, president of the nonpartisan California Voter Foundation, said the timing of postal processing appears to be a significant concern.
“Ballots rejected due to lateness are caused primarily to being postmarked too late to count, not because they arrived too late to count,” Alexander said.
Election experts have questioned whether recent operational changes within the U.S. Postal Service may be contributing to delayed postmarks.
Earlier this year, a group of mostly Democratic U.S. senators wrote to the Postal Service expressing concern that mail-processing changes could affect ballot handling during federal elections.
Updated Postal Service procedures mean postmarks may reflect when mail is processed at regional facilities rather than when it first enters the mail system.
Because processing centers have been consolidated in some areas, election officials have warned that postmark timing could be affected.
Before the June primary, California election officials encouraged voters to mail ballots as early as possible because of potential postal delays.
The June election also featured a highly competitive race for governor, which some experts believe encouraged many voters to wait until the final days before casting ballots.
In addition to late-arriving ballots, approximately 44,000 ballots were rejected because election officials determined the voter’s signature did not match the signature on file.
Another 8,300 ballots were rejected because the return envelope did not contain a signature.
State records also show that 743 ballots were rejected because those voters had already cast another ballot.
Other rejected ballots involved missing ballots inside return envelopes or multiple ballots submitted in a single envelope.
The highest rejection rate in the state occurred in Tulare County, where 3.52% of returned mail ballots were rejected.
Alpine County and Merced County followed closely, each recording rejection rates of 3.36%.
California has frequently faced criticism for taking weeks to complete vote counting after major elections, largely because state law permits ballots meeting certain requirements to continue arriving after Election Day.
Following the June primary, President Donald Trump again criticized California’s election system, while the Department of Justice opened an investigation into election administration in Los Angeles County.
Election experts emphasize that the increase in rejected ballots should not be interpreted as evidence of widespread voter fraud.
A 2025 report by the Brookings Institution found documented cases of mail ballot fraud remained extremely rare, estimating roughly four cases for every 10 million mail ballots cast, The Associated Press reported.
State officials have not identified evidence of widespread fraud connected to the June primary, but the increase in rejected ballots is expected to receive additional scrutiny as election administrators evaluate whether changes in postal operations, voter behavior or election procedures contributed to the higher rejection rate.
