Federal investigators raided a Soros-funded voter mobilization group on Thursday as part of an ongoing fraud investigation.

MS Now reported that on June 11, FBI agents raided the Ohio Organizing Collaborative (OOC) headquarters and went across the state questioning members of the group, sometimes with subpoenas or electronic devices.

Multiple sources familiar with the events told CBS News a day later that the operations were part of a fraud-related investigation.

The raid is the latest flashpoint in the Trump administration’s expanded use of federal law enforcement to probe alleged voter fraud and election-related misconduct.

The push has been cheered by conservatives who have long argued such cases were underenforced and condemned by Democrats and voting rights groups who say the effort risks turning the FBI into a political weapon against liberal voter registration operations.

OOC is a nonprofit organization that partners with the Democratic Party in Ohio on voter mobilization and registration efforts. It is especially active in ballot referendums, using its huge network of donors, including the philanthropies of the Soros family.

The Justice Department declined to comment on the specifics of the alleged investigation.

“Search warrants are authorized by a judge, and anything said by any organization or others in the media is unfounded speculation, as the target of any investigation is not privy to the search warrant affidavit until after indictment,” a DOJ official told Fox News.

Last year, the group spent $250,000 to oppose a GOP-led effort to block codifying the right to an abortion in Ohio’s constitution and another $300,000 on a subsequent Republican redistricting effort.

OOC funds these things by tapping a deep well of liberal donors at the very top level.

Recent tax documents show the organization had more than $10 million in revenue in 2024.

OOC’s considerable financial resources are derived from a host of high-profile Democratic-aligned donor organizations like the Soros family’s philanthropies, New Venture Fund, and the Tides Foundation, as well as unions including the American Federation of Teachers and the Service Employees International Union.

Between 2019 and 2020, the Soros family’s Foundation to Promote Open Society gave OOC around $1.9 million.

In 2021, the Open Society Action Fund gave another $1 million to OOC’s sister organization, the Ohio Organizing Campaign, and followed up with another $1 million in 2023.

OOC has described the federal scrutiny as an example of the Trump administration politicizing the justice system.

OOC faced criticism in 2017 when a paid canvasser working with the group pleaded guilty to his involvement in a fraudulent voter registration operation.

Republicans, however, have yet to produce conclusive evidence of widespread voter fraud in recent election cycles.

“How can they distract and intimidate civil rights leaders and voters and community leaders who are helping people get registered to vote, and create a national spectacle about it?” Prentiss Haney, an OOC board member authorized to discuss the matter on behalf of the group, told MS Now.

“That is the only reason why they would choose to do that, do it now, in the middle of a contested political election in the state. There’s no other reason. They have no evidence of that,” Haney added.

Earlier this year, President Donald Trump called for federal racketeering charges against Soros and his son, Alexander.

“George Soros, and his wonderful Radical Left son, should be charged with RICO because of their support of Violent Protests, and much more, all throughout the United States of America,” Trump wrote on Truth Social.

“We’re not going to allow these lunatics to rip apart America any more, never giving it so much as a chance to ‘BREATHE,’ and be FREE. Soros, and his group of psychopaths, have caused great damage to our Country! That includes his Crazy, West Coast friends. Be careful, we’re watching you! Thank you for your attention to this matter!” Trump added.

Maxine Waters Gets Huge Dose Of Her Own Medicine After Making Snide Remark About Speaker Candidate Jim Jordan O

THE FLOOR WAR: Maxine Waters Drowned Out in Capitol Shouting Match After Branding Jim Jordan an 'Insurrectionist'

WASHINGTON, D.C. — JUNE 21, 2026 — The legislative machinery of the United States Capitol has collapsed into an absolute state of raw, chaotic friction, as a high-stakes floor debate over the vacant Speaker's chair triggered an explosive, shouting showdown that completely paralyzed standard House decorum.

What happens when a senior progressive firebrand shatters chamber protocol to target a powerful committee chairman on live television, only to face immediate, deafening retaliation from the majority? For an already fractured legislature, the answer is an immediate, high-velocity institutional explosion. Representative Maxine Waters (D-Calif.) was forcefully shouted down by House members on Tuesday after she openly labeled Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) an “insurrectionist” during a tense debate over the selection of the next Speaker of the House.

The confrontation detonated at the exact moment Jordan faced a difficult, high-threshold first ballot to secure the speaker's gavel. Waters initialed her floor time by voicing formal support for House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, before pivoting with clinical aggression to direct her remarks squarely at Jordan. Republican members immediately swarmed the microphone perimeter, drowning out her comments with a massive wall of opposition shouts. Bypassing all diplomatic scripts, one unnamed Republican was heard yelling over the din: “Huh? What did the Communist say?”

I. THE 17-VOTE DEFICIT AND THE COALITION VETO

Jordan responded to the fierce floor ambush with a calculated smirk but completely declined to engage the California Democrat directly. However, the raw political data logged once the electronic ballot boxes closed confirmed an immediate mathematical roadblock for the conservative vanguard.

The statistical reality confirmed that Jordan fell exactly 17 votes short of the 217 needed to win on the first ballot. The institutional gridlock was tightly sealed when every single House Democrat voted in lockstep for Hakeem Jeffries, while several rebel Republicans stubbornly defected to cast their votes for alternative candidates.

Emerging from an intense, closed-door strategy huddle late Tuesday night, an unyielding Jordan told a swarm of reporters that the conservative conference would continue driving forward at true wartime speed without forming any type of coalition government with the minority:

“We’re gonna keep going. No one in our conference wants to see any type of coalition government with Democrats. So we’re going to keep working, and we’re going to get to the votes.” — Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan

II. THE MOMENTUM BLITZ: MALLIOTAKIS INTERVENES

While critics weaponize the initial ballot failure to paint the majority as deeply unstable, key faction leaders are mobilizing to reinforce Jordan’s defenses. Representative Nicole Malliotakis (R-N.Y.) appeared on Fox News to inject an immediate shot of adrenaline into the conference, declaring that she will continue supporting Jordan and firmly believes a powerful momentum is actively building in his favor.

Blasting outside media analysts who are attempting to predict the downfall of the conservative ticket, Malliotakis issued an absolute, unvarnished ultimatum:

"Anyone claiming to know exactly what will happen next is full of it." — Rep. Nicole Malliotakis

The House is officially scheduled to reconvene at 11 a.m. ET Wednesday morning to unleash another high-velocity round of voting.

III. THE MCCARTHY REVENGE AND THE WAR RESOLUTION

The internal friction paralyzing the majority has drawn devastating, high-threshold elite blowback from traditional conservative publishing organs. The Wall Street Journal editorial board issued a blistering, front-page critique of the House Republican conference on Tuesday night. The editorial laid the absolute blame for the legislative meltdown squarely at the feet of the eight rebel members who originally removed former Speaker Kevin McCarthy—lambasting them for creating an absolute structural vacuum without possessing a clear plan or a viable alternative candidate.

[ THE STRATEGIC PRIORITY MATRIX ]
* IMMEDIATE TARGET: Secure the 217 Speaker Gavel Threshold
* FOREIGN ALLIANCE: Establish Maximum Security Resolution Supporting Israel
* OPERATIONS NODE:  Joint Coordination with HFAC Chairman Michael McCaul
====================================================================
STATUS: Legislative drafting frozen until internal House gridlock is broken.

Despite the crossfire, Jordan has already mapped out his primary national security trajectory. He has stated that one of his immediate, prime priorities upon seizing the Speaker's gavel will be to deploy the full authority of the House to ensure Israel receives all necessary support in its war against Hamas. To bypass typical administrative lethality, Jordan confirmed he is already preparing to work directly with House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Michael McCaul and the Senate on a sweeping, unified resolution backing the Jewish state.

THE FINAL VERDICT

As the ticking clock races toward Wednesday's 11 a.m. showdown and the nation's premier legislative body remains completely paralyzed, the boundaries of congressional decorum have officially dissolved. The old-guard playbook of polite floor consensus has crashed against a wall of absolute partisan hostility.

Senate Votes 50-49 on SAVE America Act

Washington, D.C. - June 14, 2026

Senate Approves SAVE America Act Amendment on 50-49 Vote but Falls Short of Procedural Threshold

The U.S. Senate voted 50-49 Thursday night in favor of an amendment offered by Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT) to include the House-passed SAVE America Act in a budget reconciliation package. The measure would require proof of U.S. citizenship for federal voter registration and strengthen voter identification requirements nationwide.

Because the amendment was offered as a waiver to budget rules, Senate procedures required a three-fifths supermajority of 60 votes for adoption. Every Democratic senator voted against the proposal, leaving supporters 10 votes short of the threshold needed to overcome procedural objections.

The vote marked an improvement over an earlier election-integrity amendment offered by Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC), which failed 48-50 after four Republicans joined Democrats in opposition. When Lee later offered the clean House version of the SAVE America Act, Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME) switched her vote to support the measure. Sens. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK), Mitch McConnell (R-KY), and Thom Tillis (R-NC) continued to oppose the amendment.

Vice President JD Vance, serving as president of the Senate, was available to cast a tie-breaking vote if needed, meaning supporters effectively demonstrated the ability to secure 51 votes.

“The motivation behind this effort is to ensure that only eligible citizens participate in federal elections and to strengthen public confidence in the outcomes,” supporters of the legislation argued during debate.

Opponents maintained that existing state and federal safeguards already prevent non-citizens from voting and that additional documentation requirements could create unnecessary barriers for eligible voters.

The SAVE America Act has been a top Republican priority for election administration reform. The House previously passed the legislation, and it has received strong support from President Trump and Vice President Vance. Republican leaders have emphasized citizenship verification as a central component of election security ahead of the 2026 midterm elections.

The Thursday night vote occurred during a marathon “vote-a-rama” session tied to broader legislation that includes approximately $70 billion in immigration enforcement and border security funding. Because the SAVE Act amendment did not clear the 60-vote hurdle, the underlying border security measure is expected to advance without the election provisions attached.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune has repeatedly identified the 60-vote cloture requirement as the primary obstacle to passing election-related legislation, given unified Democratic opposition. Thursday’s tally reinforced that assessment while also showing that a Senate majority can be assembled behind the core elements of the SAVE America Act.

The outcome has renewed discussion among Republicans about Senate rules and potential alternative pathways to advance the legislation in the future. For the present, the measure remains blocked by procedural requirements despite securing majority support in the chamber.

The vote also highlighted internal divisions within the Republican conference on election-related matters. While most Republicans supported the clean House version, three senators continued to oppose it on final passage.

Supporters view the 50-49 result as evidence that the legislation enjoys sufficient backing to move forward under different procedural circumstances. Critics of the current Senate rules argue that the filibuster effectively allows a minority to prevent majority-supported election integrity measures from becoming law.

The SAVE America Act provisions are expected to remain a point of contention in coming months as lawmakers prepare for the 2026 midterm elections and continue debating the balance between election security and access.