Former FBI Agent: Bondi Has ‘Slam Dunk’ Conspiracy Case Against Obama Feds

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Attorney General Pam Bondi is reportedly sitting on what legal experts and former investigators are calling a "slam dunk" conspiracy case against a coordinated group of federal agents and prosecutors. According to Jonathan Gilliam, a former FBI agent and Navy SEAL, recently uncovered documents provide irrefutable evidence that high-ranking officials weaponized the Justice Department to target Donald Trump while actively suppressing investigations into the Clinton Family Foundation.
Appearing on the Just the News, No Noise television program, Gilliam argued that the evidence—now in the hands of Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel—shows a pattern of behavior that mirrors a mafia-style enterprise. He suggested that the "same cast of characters" has been involved in multiple conspiracies to falsify information against Trump for the purpose of overthrowing an election.
The Mafia-Style Conspiracy: Cartels and Cover-ups
Gilliam proposed that the Justice Department treat these rogue actors as a criminal organization. "If this was a mafia case, and we had this clear-cut of an example of a group of people committing two or more crimes for the furtherance of their political group... this would be a slam dunk case for any U.S. Attorney," Gilliam stated.
Falsified Evidence: Documents reportedly show agents were encouraged to "create and falsify" evidence to justify investigations into Trump.
Protecting the Clintons: While Trump was targeted, FBI Director Kash Patel has reportedly provided evidence showing that investigators were repeatedly blocked from advancing corruption probes into Hillary Clinton.
Mar-a-Lago Oversight: Gilliam noted that agents were overruled when they advised that there was insufficient probable cause for the 2022 search of Trump’s Florida residence.
Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon echoed these concerns, stating she believes there is sufficient evidence to allege a coordinated effort between federal and state prosecutors to violate the civil liberties of the President and his supporters.
Obama-Era DEA Official Arrested in Cartel Sting
Adding fuel to the fire regarding federal corruption, news broke this week of the arrest of Paul Campo, a former high-level DEA official who served during the Obama administration. Campo, the former deputy chief of the Office for Financial Operations, was caught in an undercover sting operation.
The Allegations: Prosecutors say Campo believed he was helping the Jalisco New Generation Cartel move cocaine and offered to launder millions of dollars for the organization.
The Sting: Campo and his accomplice were caught interacting with an undercover operative posing as a cartel member in late 2024.
The Legacy: Campo’s 25-year career ending in a cartel indictment has become a rallying cry for the Trump administration’s claim that federal agencies were allowed to rot under previous leadership.
“We need real investigators under a 'justice czar' to look at these people and criminally investigate and charge them,” Gilliam said, warning that the crimes could potentially reach the level of sedition or even treason.
May you like
"TRAITOR": Top DHS Official Arrested for Leaking Sensitive Border Intel!
OMAR'S HUSBAND EXPOSED: Secret Wine Industry Stakes Linked to Foreign Cash?
Why the 2026 Midterms Could Be the End of the "Squad" Forever.
Looking Ahead to the 2026 Midterms
The "slam dunk" conspiracy case is set to be a cornerstone of the GOP platform for the 2026 Midterm cycle. As Pam Bondi prepares to move forward with potential indictments, the political stakes for both parties are at an all-time high.
Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) added in a press gaggle, “The era of using the law as a political weapon is coming to a close. If you broke the law to stop a political candidate, you will face justice. The American people will not tolerate a two-tiered system of justice any longer.”
Vote To Remove Minnesota Representative Ilhan Omar From Congress Being Considered By Republican Congressman

Minnesota - June 7, 2026
In a closely divided 5-3 vote that fell one short of the required threshold, Minnesota House Republicans failed to secure a subpoena compelling U.S. Rep. Ilhan Omar to testify and produce documents tied to the Feeding Our Future fraud scandal.
The outcome on May 5 marked the dramatic conclusion of months of mounting scrutiny over the congresswoman’s legislative actions and community outreach during the pandemic-era program at the center of one of the largest federal fraud investigations in recent Minnesota history. The House Fraud Prevention and State Agency Oversight Committee, operating under a bipartisan agreement that demands six votes to authorize a subpoena, saw every Republican member support the measure while all three Democrats opposed it.
Committee Chair Kristin Robbins (R-Maple Grove) argued that the subpoena had become the only remaining tool after Omar repeatedly declined invitations to appear and failed to respond to formal document requests.
“We have reached out to Representative Ilhan Omar on multiple occasions, inviting her to testify and inviting and requesting documents,” Robbins said ahead of the vote. “The only tool left for us as a committee if we want to get these documents is to issue a subpoena.”
Republicans on the panel have focused on Omar’s sponsorship of the federal MEALS Act, enacted in March 2020. They contend the legislation loosened critical oversight requirements in federal child nutrition programs and helped create the conditions that enabled large-scale fraud.
“Representative Omar had some role, whether inadvertent or not,” Robbins said. “She passed the MEALS Act in March of 2020, and that took the guardrails off the federal school nutrition program which created the conditions for Feeding Our Future.”
The Feeding Our Future scandal stands as one of Minnesota’s most significant public corruption cases in recent decades. Federal prosecutors allege that organizers and associates diverted hundreds of millions of dollars intended to feed low-income children through fabricated meal claims, shell nonprofit organizations, and fraudulent reimbursement requests. Dozens of individuals have been charged, including nonprofit founder Aimee Bock and multiple business operators connected to Minnesota’s Somali community.
Committee Republicans specifically sought communications between Omar’s office and several individuals named in the federal investigation, along with records related to her public promotion of Safari Restaurant in Minneapolis, a business later linked to the scandal. Robbins also referenced a Somali-language television appearance in which Omar highlighted the restaurant as a meal distribution site during the pandemic.
“We thought it’d be very helpful to understand from Rep. Omar’s perspective how she thought the MEALS Act impacted the community, why she brought it, what communication she had with the fraudsters,” Robbins said during the hearing.
Democrats on the committee strongly opposed the effort, accusing Republicans of politicizing the investigation and targeting Omar for partisan advantage. Dave Pinto, the committee’s lead Democrat, questioned both the timing and practical purpose of pursuing a subpoena with only days remaining in the legislative session.
“Even if Omar were to testify or information is received, I do not see the committee doing anything with that information,” Pinto argued.
Pinto further referenced broader concerns about investigations involving political opponents under the current federal administration.
“We know the president and federal administration have got no hesitation going after political enemies and investigating them in all sorts of ways,” he said during the hearing.
The failed vote effectively prevents the Minnesota House committee from compelling Omar’s testimony or documents before the legislative session ends later this month. Nevertheless, Robbins signaled that Republicans are exploring alternative avenues to continue the pursuit.
“They’re fading,” Robbins said. “But I’ll certainly talk to our friends in Congress to see if they would be willing to issue a subpoena.”
Robbins noted that federal authorities retain “a whole menu of legal options” because Omar is a sitting member of Congress. The controversy unfolds amid broader Republican efforts at both state and national levels to highlight waste, fraud, and inadequate oversight in federal spending programs enacted during the COVID-19 pandemic.
New California Leader Announced After Overnight Count as Kash Patel Demands Recount Over Democrat Fraud

Primary voters in Folsom, Rancho Cordova, and Citrus Heights went to the polls on Tuesday night to decide who would represent California’s 7th Assembly District.
According to early results from the California Secretary of State’s Office, Josh Hoover, the Republican incumbent, has surged to first place with about 54 percent of the vote as of 1 p.m. Wednesday. Democratic candidate Amy Slavensky got about 44 percent of the vote.
Based on reports from the Associated Press, the two candidates will face off in November. The seat went from being Democratic to Republican under Hoover in 2022.
Hoover, who lives in Folsom, was Kevin Kiley’s chief of staff when he was an assemblyman. He hosts the political podcast “Point of Order” and belongs to the bipartisan California Problem Solvers Caucus.
Slavensky came out of retirement to become the interim deputy superintendent for the San Juan Unified School District. She retired in 2021 as superintendent of the Amador County Unified School District.
California faced fresh criticism this week over Tuesday’s primary elections, with Democratic leaders warning that full ballot counting could take weeks.
In Los Angeles, incumbent Democrat Karen Bass fell short of 51 percent, forcing a November runoff. Republican Spencer Pratt, a former reality TV personality, leads Democrat and City Council member Nithya Raman.
With 62 percent of votes counted as of Wednesday night, New York Times figures as of Thursday morning show:
Karen Bass — 183,701 (35 percent)
Spencer Pratt — 157,116 (29.9 percent)
Nithya Raman — 119,809 (22.8 percent)
No Republican has won Los Angeles mayor in over three decades. Pratt’s performance signals voter frustration with the city after years of Democratic rule.
Spencer Pratt filed a complaint Tuesday on X against Karen Bass.
“Karen Bass just violated election law here,” Pratt wrote.
“She is so accustomed to breaking the law with no accountability, she even filmed herself doing it. Well, those days are over. We just filed a formal complaint for illegally gaming the election. We must protect our democracy.”
“Electioneering within 100 feet of a ballot box is AGAINST THE LAW. Soliciting votes at a ballot box is AGAINST THE LAW,” he wrote.
“These clear violations show a reckless disregard for the rule of law and our democratic process.”
“A person in a position of power such as Bass should be especially respectful of our democratic laws, but this is just emblematic of Karen’s mafia-like regime. It’s ‘rules for thee, but not for me,’” Pratt said.
Pratt posted a photo of the complaint. California law bans electioneering within 100 feet of ballot drop boxes. The complaint targets a Bass video showing her urging votes near a ballot box. A Bass spokesperson dismissed the complaint and questioned Pratt’s campaign.