GOP Lawmaker FINDS It - Stunning New Detail About Jeffrey Epstein Files Will Make Your Blood Boil
WASHINGTON, D.C. — April 21, 2026
Rep. Tim Burchett (R-TN) just dropped a Mother of All Bombs on the radical left’s deep state protectors, and the American people are demanding answers.
In a no-holds-barred interview, the Tennessee Republican stated he believes a client list tied to Jeffrey Epstein once existed but was deliberately destroyed by the Biden administration to shield powerful elites from exposure. “I think the files existed at one time,” Burchett said. “I think they were destroyed in the previous administration.”
This is not conspiracy theory — this is a sitting Congressman with access to the swamp calling out what millions of patriots have suspected for years. The radical left and their deep state allies weaponized every institution to destroy President Donald Trump, yet when it came to protecting their own — Hollywood predators, world leaders, and DC insiders tied to Epstein’s sick empire — the evidence mysteriously vanished.
Burchett rejected any notion that President Trump’s name appeared on such a list, stating plainly: “I think if they’d ever had anything on Trump, it would have been out Day 1 under the Biden administration.” Exactly right. The Biden regime spent years lawfaring against Trump with every fake dossier and hoax imaginable. If they had real dirt from Epstein, it would have been leaked faster than you can say “Russia collusion.”
Attorney General Pam Bondi, FBI Director Kash Patel, and Deputy Director Dan Bongino have come under fire from some MAGA voices for the DOJ’s recent memo concluding no client list exists and Epstein died by suicide. But Burchett’s blunt assessment cuts through the noise: the files were likely torched before Trump’s team could get their hands on them. The radical left spent four years covering tracks, deleting records, and protecting the elite pedophile network that thrived under their watch.
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt confirmed the DOJ conducted an exhaustive review and withheld some graphic material to protect victims. President Trump has been crystal clear — he wants the full truth exposed, no matter who it hurts. Unlike the Biden deep state, Trump’s administration isn’t in the business of shielding predators.
The radical left’s house of cards is collapsing. For years they smeared Trump while their own circles partied with Epstein. Now, as more details leak out, the American people see the real scandal: a protected elite network that preyed on the vulnerable, enabled by a corrupt system that destroyed evidence to save itself.
President Trump survived their endless witch hunts. He won in 2024 in a historic landslide. Now, with warriors like Kash Patel at the FBI, the real reckoning is beginning. No more two-tiered justice. No more deep state cover-ups. The American people deserve the full truth about Epstein’s network — and they will get it under Trump’s leadership.
Burchett is right to speak out. The destruction of those files — if it happened — is one of the greatest obstructions of justice in modern history. Patriots demand full transparency. Release everything. Let the chips fall where they may. The radical left weaponized government against Trump for years. Now the swamp is being drained, and the light is exposing the cockroaches.
We are winning. Truth is winning. And the deep state’s darkest secrets are coming into the light.
MAGA will not rest until every elite pedophile protector is held accountable. President Trump is delivering the justice the radical left tried to bury forever.
Nearly 150,000 California Mail Ballots Rejected In Primary
California election officials are examining why nearly 150,000 mail-in ballots were rejected during the state’s June primary, with late-arriving ballots accounting for most of the increase.
The higher rejection rate comes despite years of election law changes designed to make voting more accessible and ensure more ballots are ultimately counted.
According to data compiled by the California Secretary of State’s office, 148,241 mail-in ballots were rejected during the June primary, representing 1.73% of all mail ballots returned.
That marks an increase from the 2024 primary, when 108,982 ballots were rejected, or 1.56% of all mail ballots cast.
The largest reason for rejection was ballots arriving too late to qualify under California law.
State data shows that 93,479 ballots were rejected because they failed to meet the state’s deadline requirements.
California allows mail ballots to arrive up to seven days after Election Day, provided they are postmarked on or before Election Day.
Voting experts believe many of the rejected ballots received postmarks dated after Election Day, making them ineligible to be counted even if they arrived within the seven-day grace period.
Kim Alexander, president of the nonpartisan California Voter Foundation, said the timing of postal processing appears to be a significant concern.
“Ballots rejected due to lateness are caused primarily to being postmarked too late to count, not because they arrived too late to count,” Alexander said.
Election experts have questioned whether recent operational changes within the U.S. Postal Service may be contributing to delayed postmarks.
Earlier this year, a group of mostly Democratic U.S. senators wrote to the Postal Service expressing concern that mail-processing changes could affect ballot handling during federal elections.
Updated Postal Service procedures mean postmarks may reflect when mail is processed at regional facilities rather than when it first enters the mail system.
Because processing centers have been consolidated in some areas, election officials have warned that postmark timing could be affected.
Before the June primary, California election officials encouraged voters to mail ballots as early as possible because of potential postal delays.
The June election also featured a highly competitive race for governor, which some experts believe encouraged many voters to wait until the final days before casting ballots.
In addition to late-arriving ballots, approximately 44,000 ballots were rejected because election officials determined the voter’s signature did not match the signature on file.
Another 8,300 ballots were rejected because the return envelope did not contain a signature.
State records also show that 743 ballots were rejected because those voters had already cast another ballot.
Other rejected ballots involved missing ballots inside return envelopes or multiple ballots submitted in a single envelope.
The highest rejection rate in the state occurred in Tulare County, where 3.52% of returned mail ballots were rejected.
Alpine County and Merced County followed closely, each recording rejection rates of 3.36%.
California has frequently faced criticism for taking weeks to complete vote counting after major elections, largely because state law permits ballots meeting certain requirements to continue arriving after Election Day.
Following the June primary, President Donald Trump again criticized California’s election system, while the Department of Justice opened an investigation into election administration in Los Angeles County.
Election experts emphasize that the increase in rejected ballots should not be interpreted as evidence of widespread voter fraud.
A 2025 report by the Brookings Institution found documented cases of mail ballot fraud remained extremely rare, estimating roughly four cases for every 10 million mail ballots cast, The Associated Press reported.
State officials have not identified evidence of widespread fraud connected to the June primary, but the increase in rejected ballots is expected to receive additional scrutiny as election administrators evaluate whether changes in postal operations, voter behavior or election procedures contributed to the higher rejection rate.
