Here It IS: Bombshell Evidence 2020 Election Rigged Against President Trump
A top Trump official says that evidence regarding irregularities during the 2020 election will be released “soon,” proving that President Donald Trump actually won it. Ambassador Monica Crowley, the U.S. government’s chief of protocol, made the announcement on Wednesday at an event hosted by Breitbart News.
“He did win in a landslide, and we will soon be able to give evidence about that,” Crowley said, without providing further details, the Washington Times reported.
The statements align with those made by other high-ranking officials, including FBI Director Kash Patel, who have discussed evidence of a conspiracy to undermine the 2020 election, which resulted in President Joseph R. Biden being declared the winner despite strong objections from Trump.
All claims raised during and immediately after the election were rejected by both the courts and Congress, which affirmed Biden’s victory, but it’s not at all clear that courts were shown any of the evidence that is purportedly coming.
Also, a federal grand jury in Florida is now taking up the matter, with the U.S. Department of Justice bringing in former U.S. attorney and Trump ally Joe diGenova to assist the U.S. attorney’s office in the Southern District of Florida.
Trump signaled in February that “something” significant may be revealed relating to the 2020 presidential election after the FBI executed a search warrant in Fulton County, Georgia, and seized ballots and other related election materials the previous month.
Speaking on The Dan Bongino Show, Trump reiterated long-standing claims that the 2020 election was flawed and said evidence from the Fulton County search could lead to “interesting things” coming to light. He did not provide specific details about what information may emerge or when it might be disclosed.
Trump also repeated assertions that there were irregularities in vote counts in states he did not win and encouraged Republicans to consider changes to election administration processes.
He suggested that actions taken in Georgia could be part of a broader review of election conduct, though he provided no new evidence to support allegations that the 2020 results were affected by fraud.
The president did mention, however, that evidence from the search in Fulton County would soon uncover “interesting things.” He also encouraged Republicans to think about “nationalizing the voting” process.
“We have states that I won that show I didn’t win,” Trump told Bongino. “Now you’re going to see something in Georgia, where they were able to get, with a court order, the ballots.”
“You’re going to see some interesting things come out. But you know, like the 2020 election, I won that election by so much,” Trump said.
Trump’s comments follow federal authorities’ Jan. 28 execution of a court-approved warrant at the Fulton County Election Hub and Operations Center in Union City, where agents seized ballots from the 2020 general election, voting machine tapes, and voter rolls as part of an ongoing investigation.
Federal officials have said the search was part of normal investigative procedures under a criminal warrant; they have not released further details on potential charges or findings tied to the seizure.
Fulton County officials on Monday sued the federal government, claiming the search warrant execution was flawed and that FBI agents improperly seized voting data.
The Fulton County materials are at the center of renewed scrutiny related to election administration and record preservation. Critics and supporters alike have offered differing interpretations of the search, with Republican allies of Trump calling it overdue scrutiny and Democratic officials dismissing broader claims of fraud.
BREAKING NOW: 'National Emergency' Declared, Trump Called In
WASHINGTON, D.C. — Secretary of State Marco Rubio told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee that the United States has imposed a blockade preventing Iranian ships from transiting the Strait of Hormuz after Iran moved to restrict passage for other vessels.
Rubio stated that the measure has already cost Iran hundreds of millions of dollars in lost revenue. He said the decision followed Iran’s failure to reach an agreement on reopening the waterway to all shipping.
Rubio described the current talks with Iran as distinct from negotiations with other countries, noting that the Iranian decision-making process is slow and fragmented.
He said the regime has recently agreed to discuss aspects of its nuclear program that it had previously refused to address. At the same time, he indicated that U.S. patience is limited and that further progress is required on nuclear issues and the status of the Strait of Hormuz.
Iranian state media reported that Tehran had suspended talks with the United States, citing Israeli strikes on Hezbollah in Lebanon. President Trump stated on social media that negotiations between the two countries remain ongoing.
Rubio’s testimony did not directly address the Iranian media reports but emphasized that any agreement would need to include verifiable steps on Iran’s nuclear activities and the restoration of open passage through the Strait of Hormuz.
The blockade and the status of talks come as the United States continues to enforce export controls and sanctions related to Iran’s nuclear program and regional activities.
Administration officials have described the current approach as combining diplomatic engagement with measures to increase pressure on Tehran. Rubio’s remarks before the committee provided the most detailed public update on the status of the discussions in recent days.
The situation remains fluid, with both sides continuing to exchange messages through diplomatic channels. No timeline for further rounds of talks or specific next steps was announced during the hearing. Congressional committees are expected to continue monitoring developments related to Iran policy in the coming weeks.
Vote To Remove Minnesota Representative Ilhan Omar From Congress Being Considered By Republican Congressman
In a closely divided 5-3 vote that fell one short of the required threshold, Minnesota House Republicans failed to secure a subpoena compelling U.S. Rep. Ilhan Omar to testify and produce documents tied to the Feeding Our Future fraud scandal.
The outcome on May 5 marked the dramatic conclusion of months of mounting scrutiny over the congresswoman’s legislative actions and community outreach during the pandemic-era program at the center of one of the largest federal fraud investigations in recent Minnesota history. The House Fraud Prevention and State Agency Oversight Committee, operating under a bipartisan agreement that demands six votes to authorize a subpoena, saw every Republican member support the measure while all three Democrats opposed it.
Committee Chair Kristin Robbins (R-Maple Grove) argued that the subpoena had become the only remaining tool after Omar repeatedly declined invitations to appear and failed to respond to formal document requests.
“We have reached out to Representative Ilhan Omar on multiple occasions, inviting her to testify and inviting and requesting documents,” Robbins said ahead of the vote. “The only tool left for us as a committee if we want to get these documents is to issue a subpoena.”
Republicans on the panel have focused on Omar’s sponsorship of the federal MEALS Act, enacted in March 2020. They contend the legislation loosened critical oversight requirements in federal child nutrition programs and helped create the conditions that enabled large-scale fraud.
“Representative Omar had some role, whether inadvertent or not,” Robbins said. “She passed the MEALS Act in March of 2020, and that took the guardrails off the federal school nutrition program which created the conditions for Feeding Our Future.”
The Feeding Our Future scandal stands as one of Minnesota’s most significant public corruption cases in recent decades. Federal prosecutors allege that organizers and associates diverted hundreds of millions of dollars intended to feed low-income children through fabricated meal claims, shell nonprofit organizations, and fraudulent reimbursement requests. Dozens of individuals have been charged, including nonprofit founder Aimee Bock and multiple business operators connected to Minnesota’s Somali community.
Committee Republicans specifically sought communications between Omar’s office and several individuals named in the federal investigation, along with records related to her public promotion of Safari Restaurant in Minneapolis, a business later linked to the scandal. Robbins also referenced a Somali-language television appearance in which Omar highlighted the restaurant as a meal distribution site during the pandemic.
“We thought it’d be very helpful to understand from Rep. Omar’s perspective how she thought the MEALS Act impacted the community, why she brought it, what communication she had with the fraudsters,” Robbins said during the hearing.
Democrats on the committee strongly opposed the effort, accusing Republicans of politicizing the investigation and targeting Omar for partisan advantage. Dave Pinto, the committee’s lead Democrat, questioned both the timing and practical purpose of pursuing a subpoena with only days remaining in the legislative session.
“Even if Omar were to testify or information is received, I do not see the committee doing anything with that information,” Pinto argued.
Pinto further referenced broader concerns about investigations involving political opponents under the current federal administration.
“We know the president and federal administration have got no hesitation going after political enemies and investigating them in all sorts of ways,” he said during the hearing.
The failed vote effectively prevents the Minnesota House committee from compelling Omar’s testimony or documents before the legislative session ends later this month. Nevertheless, Robbins signaled that Republicans are exploring alternative avenues to continue the pursuit.
“They’re fading,” Robbins said. “But I’ll certainly talk to our friends in Congress to see if they would be willing to issue a subpoena.”
Robbins noted that federal authorities retain “a whole menu of legal options” because Omar is a sitting member of Congress. The controversy unfolds amid broader Republican efforts at both state and national levels to highlight waste, fraud, and inadequate oversight in federal spending programs enacted during the COVID-19 pandemic.
