House Votes to Remove Energy Dept. Authorities Over Household Appliances

The House voted on Tuesday to pass a bill that would remove the Department of Energy’s authority to establish energy conservation standards for household appliances. The vote, which was 217-190, primarily followed party lines, aiming to limit what many consider a direct intrusion of regulation into American homes.
The bill, introduced by GOP Rep. Rick Allen of Georgia, aims to amend the Energy Policy and Conservation Act by eliminating the requirement for the Department of Energy (DOE) to periodically update energy conservation standards. Instead, the DOE would only be permitted to amend these standards when necessary.
This represents a significant change from the current system, which places ongoing pressure on Washington bureaucrats to impose increasingly stringent regulations on appliances like dishwashers, stoves, and washing machines.
According to the Washington Examiner, the proposed changes would establish a new process for the public to request specific energy standards. Additionally, it would introduce new criteria to assess whether a standard is economically justifiable and technologically feasible—two concepts that were seldom emphasized by the Department of Energy during the Biden administration.
The legislation aims to address the fundamental mechanism that enabled the previous administration to enforce aggressive efficiency mandates across nearly all appliance categories. Currently, the DOE is obligated to periodically raise standards, which essentially means that one administration’s environmental goals end up becoming the regulatory baseline for the next. Allen’s bill effectively breaks this cycle.

Provisions of the legislation include:
Terminating the mandatory periodic update requirement for energy conservation standards
Allowing the DOE to amend standards as needed, rather than on a forced schedule
Creating a public petition process for specific energy standards
Imposing new criteria requiring standards to be economically justifiable and technologically feasible
-
Banning the DOE from updating energy conservation standards for distribution transformers
Distribution transformers are essential components of infrastructure, and stricter efficiency standards on them can have significant implications for grid reliability and costs. The ban indicates that House Republicans recognize the importance of balancing environmental goals with the necessity of maintaining electricity supply.
The House is scheduled to vote on the “Homeowner Energy Freedom Act,” introduced by Rep. Craig Goldman of Texas. This bill aims to repeal several provisions of the Inflation Reduction Act. Specifically, it would eliminate funding for the Department of Energy to implement a new high-efficiency electric home rebate program, provide training grants for home energy efficiency contractors, and offer financial assistance to states for meeting the latest energy conservation building codes.
Both bills pose a direct challenge to the previous administration’s strategy of embedding green mandates profoundly into federal law and agency practices, ensuring their survival through a change in the White House.
“The true cost of homeownership rose during the Biden-Harris Administration because of heavy-handed government mandates,” said Rep. Brett Guthrie (R-Ky.), chairman of the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
“Unworkable policies created new and unattainable energy standards under the banner of a radical rush-to-green agenda that raises prices and harms American families,” he added. “As President Trump discusses his vision for reliable and affordable energy, House Republicans are working to support the commonsense work his Administration is doing to make life more affordable for families across the country.”
Allen, of Georgia, noted in December when he introduced his bill, that it would “prevent future administrations from prioritizing a radical rush-to-green agenda over the affordability and availability of reliable household appliances that Americans rely on every day.”
The Biden administration made it a priority under its Energy Department to target ordinary, everyday appliances Americans rely on.
The result was a raft of new rules and regulations that ultimately made appliances more expensive and narrowed choices for consumers, according to industry experts.
'Guilty Of Fraud' - Hammer Dropped On Former First Lady Jill Biden During Live Fox News Segment

McEnany Accuses Jill Biden Of Misleading Americans About Debate Performance
Posted July 15, 2026
Former White House press secretary and Fox News host Kayleigh McEnany accused former first lady Jill Biden of misleading the American public about President Joe Biden’s condition following his widely criticized debate performance during the 2024 campaign.

McEnany made the remarks Thursday during an appearance on Fox News Channel’s “America’s Newsroom,” where she reacted to comments Jill Biden reportedly made in her upcoming book regarding the president’s performance during the debate that ultimately intensified questions about his age and fitness for office.
The discussion began when co-host Dana Perino referenced remarks Jill Biden made immediately following the debate.
At a campaign event after the debate, Jill Biden praised her husband’s performance.
“Joe, you did such a great job. You answered every question,” she said at the time.
Perino contrasted those comments with more recent claims attributed to Jill Biden and raised questions about the apparent inconsistency.
“So now we know that this is what she’s saying in her book,” Perino said. “And the question I would love to ask her is where are you lying then or now?”
McEnany responded by arguing that Jill Biden’s reaction following the debate was inconsistent with her more recent descriptions of the event.
“It’s a great question,” McEnany said.
“That is not the reaction of someone who believes they just watched their husband have a stroke. It is an absolute lie.”
McEnany then accused the former first lady of concealing concerns about the president’s condition from voters.
“It was fraud,” she said.
“What she did fraud on the American public and she’s continuing it by saying she had never seen him like that before or after.”
The debate between Biden and President Donald Trump became a turning point in the 2024 election cycle, with many Democrats publicly expressing concern about Biden’s performance and his ability to continue his campaign.
Questions about Biden’s age and mental sharpness had circulated for years, but the debate intensified those concerns and fueled calls from some Democrats for him to step aside.
During the Fox News discussion, McEnany referenced comments previously made by veteran journalist Carl Bernstein regarding Biden’s condition behind the scenes.
“Dana, you all remember Carl Bernstein, who said he talked to people who knew Joe Biden, loved Joe Biden, supported Joe Biden, and they were adamant that what we saw was not a one-off,” McEnany said.
According to McEnany, Bernstein reported that individuals close to Biden had observed similar episodes before the debate.
“They said it had happened 15 or 20 times prior, him losing his train of thought,” she said.
McEnany also cited a fundraiser Bernstein reportedly described.
“He described a fundraiser where he froze up and seemed to have some type of rigor mortis,” she said.
“This is not something that was a one-off.”
McEnany argued that concerns about Biden’s condition were widely known among those close to him.
“This was well known,” she said.
She then questioned why Jill Biden continued publicly defending her husband following the debate.
“So why did she keep up with the fraud on the American people?” McEnany asked.
The former first lady has repeatedly defended her husband and rejected claims that she or members of his inner circle concealed concerns about his health, Breitbart News reported.
The debate over Biden’s condition became one of the defining political stories of the 2024 election cycle and continued after he ultimately left the race.
McEnany’s comments reflect ongoing scrutiny surrounding what Biden’s family, advisers and top Democratic officials knew about his condition and when they knew it.
Neither Jill Biden nor representatives for the former president immediately responded to McEnany’s latest remarks.
As new books and accounts from those involved continue to emerge, questions surrounding Biden’s final campaign and the decisions made by those closest to him remain a major topic of political debate.