In Truth Social Post Trump Says U.S. ‘Near Endgame’ in Iran, U.S. Nears Key Military Goals
U.S. Nears “Endgame” in Iran as Trump Outlines Final Objectives on Truth Social ⚡🇺🇸
President Donald Trump signaled that the United States may be entering the final phase of its military campaign against Iran, declaring that U.S. forces are now “near the endgame” after weeks of sustained operations.
In a detailed series of posts on Truth Social, Trump emphasized that the campaign has focused on crippling Iran’s core military capabilities, including its missile systems, defense infrastructure, and strategic assets. According to his statements, these objectives are now close to being fully achieved, marking a potential turning point in the conflict.
🎯 A Campaign Focused on Key Targets
Trump outlined several major goals of the operation, including:
Severely weakening Iran’s missile capabilities
Disrupting its defense and military production systems
Limiting its ability to develop advanced weapons and nuclear potential
He suggested that these efforts have already had a significant impact, with Iran’s military strength “largely degraded” as a result of the sustained strikes.
⚖️ “Very Close” to Completion
Trump’s message echoed his earlier remarks that the U.S. is “getting very close” to meeting its objectives, raising the possibility that military operations could soon be scaled back.
At the same time, he hinted that the U.S. may not maintain a long-term security role in the region—particularly in the Strait of Hormuz, a critical global oil route. Instead, he suggested that other nations who rely on the waterway should take primary responsibility for its protection.
🌍 Strategic Shift and Global Implications
The potential wind-down comes at a sensitive moment. The conflict has already:
Disrupted global energy markets
Increased tensions across the Middle East
-
Raised concerns about long-term regional stability
While Trump’s statements project confidence, analysts note that the situation remains complex. Some officials caution that being “near the endgame” does not necessarily mean the conflict is fully resolved, especially with ongoing risks of retaliation and escalation.
🔍 What Comes Next?
Trump’s remarks suggest a possible transition from active military operations to a more limited role, focusing on deterrence rather than direct engagement.
However, key questions remain:
Will Iran’s capabilities be permanently reduced?
Can stability be maintained without continued U.S. involvement?
And who will ultimately secure critical global routes like Hormuz?
🧭 The Bottom Line
For now, the message from Washington is clear:
The U.S. believes it is close to achieving its mission in Iran.But whether this truly marks the end—or just another phase—of the conflict remains to be seen.
👇 What do you think—Is this really the “endgame,” or just the beginning of a new stage?
Nearly 150,000 California Mail Ballots Rejected In Primary
California election officials are examining why nearly 150,000 mail-in ballots were rejected during the state’s June primary, with late-arriving ballots accounting for most of the increase.
The higher rejection rate comes despite years of election law changes designed to make voting more accessible and ensure more ballots are ultimately counted.
According to data compiled by the California Secretary of State’s office, 148,241 mail-in ballots were rejected during the June primary, representing 1.73% of all mail ballots returned.
That marks an increase from the 2024 primary, when 108,982 ballots were rejected, or 1.56% of all mail ballots cast.
The largest reason for rejection was ballots arriving too late to qualify under California law.
State data shows that 93,479 ballots were rejected because they failed to meet the state’s deadline requirements.
California allows mail ballots to arrive up to seven days after Election Day, provided they are postmarked on or before Election Day.
Voting experts believe many of the rejected ballots received postmarks dated after Election Day, making them ineligible to be counted even if they arrived within the seven-day grace period.
Kim Alexander, president of the nonpartisan California Voter Foundation, said the timing of postal processing appears to be a significant concern.
“Ballots rejected due to lateness are caused primarily to being postmarked too late to count, not because they arrived too late to count,” Alexander said.
Election experts have questioned whether recent operational changes within the U.S. Postal Service may be contributing to delayed postmarks.
Earlier this year, a group of mostly Democratic U.S. senators wrote to the Postal Service expressing concern that mail-processing changes could affect ballot handling during federal elections.
Updated Postal Service procedures mean postmarks may reflect when mail is processed at regional facilities rather than when it first enters the mail system.
Because processing centers have been consolidated in some areas, election officials have warned that postmark timing could be affected.
Before the June primary, California election officials encouraged voters to mail ballots as early as possible because of potential postal delays.
The June election also featured a highly competitive race for governor, which some experts believe encouraged many voters to wait until the final days before casting ballots.
In addition to late-arriving ballots, approximately 44,000 ballots were rejected because election officials determined the voter’s signature did not match the signature on file.
Another 8,300 ballots were rejected because the return envelope did not contain a signature.
State records also show that 743 ballots were rejected because those voters had already cast another ballot.
Other rejected ballots involved missing ballots inside return envelopes or multiple ballots submitted in a single envelope.
The highest rejection rate in the state occurred in Tulare County, where 3.52% of returned mail ballots were rejected.
Alpine County and Merced County followed closely, each recording rejection rates of 3.36%.
California has frequently faced criticism for taking weeks to complete vote counting after major elections, largely because state law permits ballots meeting certain requirements to continue arriving after Election Day.
Following the June primary, President Donald Trump again criticized California’s election system, while the Department of Justice opened an investigation into election administration in Los Angeles County.
Election experts emphasize that the increase in rejected ballots should not be interpreted as evidence of widespread voter fraud.
A 2025 report by the Brookings Institution found documented cases of mail ballot fraud remained extremely rare, estimating roughly four cases for every 10 million mail ballots cast, The Associated Press reported.
State officials have not identified evidence of widespread fraud connected to the June primary, but the increase in rejected ballots is expected to receive additional scrutiny as election administrators evaluate whether changes in postal operations, voter behavior or election procedures contributed to the higher rejection rate.
