It's Treason! Democrat Ilhan Omar Just Sided Against America - She Must Be Expelled From the House
WASHINGTON D.C. — As the United States braces for a massive military confrontation with Iran, Representative Ilhan Omar (D-MN) is facing an absolute firestorm of criticism—including accusations of treason—after posting a highly inflammatory and historically inaccurate tweet accusing the U.S. of deliberately targeting Muslim nations based on their religion.
While the State Department urgently advised U.S. Embassy personnel in Israel to evacuate via commercial flights ahead of anticipated Iranian retaliation, Omar took to social media to blast the American government.
THE DISASTROUS RAMADAN TWEET
In her controversial post on X, the "Squad" member framed the escalating geopolitical conflict as an act of religious bigotry.
“Iraq was attacked by the US during Ramadan and it is sickening to know that the US is again going to attack Iran during Ramadan,” Omar wrote. “The US apparently loves to strike Muslim countries during Ramadan and I am convinced it isn’t what these countries have done to violate international law but about who they worship.”
Critics immediately slammed the rhetoric. In the midst of an active military standoff, accusing the U.S. armed forces of religiously motivated warfare gives adversaries like the Iranian regime powerful propaganda to weaponize. Opponents argue that a sitting member of Congress framing U.S. military action as anti-Muslim aggression inherently undermines American diplomatic leverage and emboldens hostile nations.
THE 'TREASON' DEBATE AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT
The outrage over the tweet quickly spiraled into demands for her expulsion from the House, with some critics throwing out the word "treason."
However, legal experts have been quick to point out the strict constitutional realities of that accusation:
The Legal Standard: Under the U.S. Constitution, treason is narrowly defined as levying war against the United States or adhering to its enemies, giving them tangible "aid and comfort."
-
The First Amendment Shield: Supporters of Omar counter that no matter how offensive or controversial her criticism of U.S. foreign policy may be, it is strictly protected political speech. Courts have historically set an extraordinarily high bar for treason, requiring overt acts of sabotage or espionage—not just bad posts on X.
HUMILIATED BY A COMMUNITY NOTE
While Omar may be shielded by the First Amendment, she was not shielded from the internet's fact-checkers. Her post was quickly hit with a brutal Community Note highlighting her completely fabricated timeline of U.S. military history.
Users pointed out that President George W. Bush's invasion of Iraq began on March 20, 2003—a full seven months before Ramadan. Furthermore, Operation Desert Storm was launched by President George H.W. Bush on January 17, 1991, roughly two months before Ramadan began.
Dalia al-Aqidi, a Muslim Iraqi-American currently running against Omar for her House seat, seized on the glaring historical errors.
"Claiming America ‘chooses Ramadan to attack Muslims’ is not advocacy, it is a deliberate lie meant to inflame anger and divide Americans," al-Aqidi stated.
A PATTERN OF DEFLECTION
This is far from the first time Omar has lashed out when her factual claims have been challenged. She has a well-documented history of aggressively dismissing reporters and critics:
The Minnesota Fraud Case: When pressed on Capitol Hill about a massive $9 billion social services fraud case in her home district, Omar attacked the reporter's intelligence, stating, "Your brain has told you that it is possible for half of the resources for our public service to have disappeared? Listen to yourself."
Financial Disclosures: Responding to questions on TikTok regarding her family's reported wealth and her husband's company, Omar angrily told critics to "Learn to read before you post misleading s–t."
As the airspace over the Middle East threatens to close and U.S. troops prepare for potential retaliation from Tehran, Omar's willingness to attack her own country's motives is leaving many Americans questioning where her priorities truly lie.
'Guilty Of Fraud' - Hammer Dropped On Former First Lady Jill Biden During Live Fox News Segment
McEnany Accuses Jill Biden Of Misleading Americans About Debate Performance
Posted July 15, 2026
Former White House press secretary and Fox News host Kayleigh McEnany accused former first lady Jill Biden of misleading the American public about President Joe Biden’s condition following his widely criticized debate performance during the 2024 campaign.
McEnany made the remarks Thursday during an appearance on Fox News Channel’s “America’s Newsroom,” where she reacted to comments Jill Biden reportedly made in her upcoming book regarding the president’s performance during the debate that ultimately intensified questions about his age and fitness for office.
The discussion began when co-host Dana Perino referenced remarks Jill Biden made immediately following the debate.
At a campaign event after the debate, Jill Biden praised her husband’s performance.
“Joe, you did such a great job. You answered every question,” she said at the time.
Perino contrasted those comments with more recent claims attributed to Jill Biden and raised questions about the apparent inconsistency.
“So now we know that this is what she’s saying in her book,” Perino said. “And the question I would love to ask her is where are you lying then or now?”
McEnany responded by arguing that Jill Biden’s reaction following the debate was inconsistent with her more recent descriptions of the event.
“It’s a great question,” McEnany said.
“That is not the reaction of someone who believes they just watched their husband have a stroke. It is an absolute lie.”
McEnany then accused the former first lady of concealing concerns about the president’s condition from voters.
“It was fraud,” she said.
“What she did fraud on the American public and she’s continuing it by saying she had never seen him like that before or after.”
The debate between Biden and President Donald Trump became a turning point in the 2024 election cycle, with many Democrats publicly expressing concern about Biden’s performance and his ability to continue his campaign.
Questions about Biden’s age and mental sharpness had circulated for years, but the debate intensified those concerns and fueled calls from some Democrats for him to step aside.
During the Fox News discussion, McEnany referenced comments previously made by veteran journalist Carl Bernstein regarding Biden’s condition behind the scenes.
“Dana, you all remember Carl Bernstein, who said he talked to people who knew Joe Biden, loved Joe Biden, supported Joe Biden, and they were adamant that what we saw was not a one-off,” McEnany said.
According to McEnany, Bernstein reported that individuals close to Biden had observed similar episodes before the debate.
“They said it had happened 15 or 20 times prior, him losing his train of thought,” she said.
McEnany also cited a fundraiser Bernstein reportedly described.
“He described a fundraiser where he froze up and seemed to have some type of rigor mortis,” she said.
“This is not something that was a one-off.”
McEnany argued that concerns about Biden’s condition were widely known among those close to him.
“This was well known,” she said.
She then questioned why Jill Biden continued publicly defending her husband following the debate.
“So why did she keep up with the fraud on the American people?” McEnany asked.
The former first lady has repeatedly defended her husband and rejected claims that she or members of his inner circle concealed concerns about his health, Breitbart News reported.
The debate over Biden’s condition became one of the defining political stories of the 2024 election cycle and continued after he ultimately left the race.
McEnany’s comments reflect ongoing scrutiny surrounding what Biden’s family, advisers and top Democratic officials knew about his condition and when they knew it.
Neither Jill Biden nor representatives for the former president immediately responded to McEnany’s latest remarks.
As new books and accounts from those involved continue to emerge, questions surrounding Biden’s final campaign and the decisions made by those closest to him remain a major topic of political debate.
