Just 30 Minutes Ago
Born into unimaginable wealth yet shielded from its most corrosive effects, Barron Trump’s upbringing was carefully engineered by Melania Trump to emphasize humility over entitlement. Far from the caricature many expected of a former president’s son, he moved through elite schools—
Columbia Grammar, St. Andrew’s Episcopal, and Oxbridge Academy—not as a tabloid spectacle but as a reserved, observant student learning to navigate a world already judging him. His 2024 graduation quietly marked the end of a childhood lived in the crosshairs of politics and media.
Behind the scenes, his strongest anchor has remained his mother. Melania’s insistence on privacy, manners, and multilingual education—French, Slovenian, and English—gave Barron a cultural depth unusual for someone born into such a polarized dynasty. Compassionate and intelligent by those who know him, he now stands at a crossroads: burdened by a last name that divides a nation, yet equipped with the inner calm and values to define himself on his own terms.
Born into unimaginable wealth yet shielded from its most corrosive effects, Barron Trump’s upbringing was carefully engineered by Melania Trump to emphasize humility over entitlement. Far from the caricature many expected of a former president’s son, he moved through elite schools—Columbia Grammar, St. Andrew’s Episcopal, and Oxbridge Academy—not as a tabloid spectacle but as a reserved, observant student learning to navigate a world already judging him. His 2024 graduation quietly marked the end of a childhood lived in the crosshairs of politics and media.
Behind the scenes, his strongest anchor has remained his mother. Melania’s insistence on privacy, manners, and multilingual education—French, Slovenian, and English—gave Barron a cultural depth unusual for someone born into such a polarized dynasty. Compassionate and intelligent by those who know him, he now stands at a crossroads: burdened by a last name that divides a nation, yet equipped with the inner calm and values to define himself on his own terms.
Assailant convicted after Barron Trump calls London police to report crime he saw on video
Barron Trump attends President Trump’s inauguration parade in January 2025.
(Evan Vucci / Associated Press)
LONDON — The crime was in London, the suspect was Russian and the witness who saw the beating on a video call was in the United States and happened to be the youngest son of President Trump.
Barron Trump called police in the British capital and his intervention more than a year ago led Wednesday to the assault conviction of Matvei Rumiantsev, who admitted he was jealous of his girlfriend’s friendship with Trump.
Trump said he placed a late night FaceTime call to the victim, a woman he met on social media, and was startled when it was answered by a bare-chested man.
“This view lasted maybe one second and I was racing with adrenaline,” Trump told police. “The camera was then flipped to the victim getting hit while crying, stating something in Russian.”
The call was hung up after a few seconds and Trump then phoned London police in a recording in which Trump desperately pleaded for help as the dispatcher insisted he answer basic questions about the victim.
“How do you know her?” the operator asked after a back-and-forth dialog.
“I don’t think these details matter, she’s getting beat up,” Trump said.
“Can you stop being rude and actually answer my questions?” the dispatcher said. “If you want to help the person, you’ll answer my questions clearly and precisely, thank you. So how do you know her?”
Police went to the address on Jan. 18 and arrested Rumiantsev, 22, a receptionist who lived in London.
He was acquitted in Snaresbrook Crown Court of rape and choking the woman on the night Trump called police, and an additional rape and assault alleged in November 2024.
Rumiantsev testified that he was jealous of Trump but that he also felt bad for him because he thought that his girlfriend was leading him on.
Defense lawyer Sasha Wass said that Trump didn’t know the woman had a boyfriend and questioned how much he could have seen in five or seven seconds of video.
Wass said that the woman exploited her ties to Trump to make her boyfriend envious in a “relationship full of dramas.”
Trump, 19, the only child of Donald and Melania Trump, didn’t testify in the case.
Justice Bennathan advised jurors before they began deliberating to treat Barron Trump’s accounts — on the recording of his call to police and his follow-up email to investigators — with caution because he hadn’t been subjected to cross-examination.
“If he had done so, no doubt, he could have been asked about things such as whether he ever got a good view of what happened, whether he actually saw [the woman] being assaulted, or jumped to this conclusion on the basis of her screams,” Bennathan said. “He might also have been asked whether his perception was biased because he was close friends with [her].”
Rumiantsev was also convicted of perverting the course of justice, because he sent the woman a letter from jail asking her to retract her allegations. He’s scheduled to be sentenced on March 27.
Melley writes for the Associated Press
Nearly 150,000 California Mail Ballots Rejected In Primary
California election officials are examining why nearly 150,000 mail-in ballots were rejected during the state’s June primary, with late-arriving ballots accounting for most of the increase.
The higher rejection rate comes despite years of election law changes designed to make voting more accessible and ensure more ballots are ultimately counted.
According to data compiled by the California Secretary of State’s office, 148,241 mail-in ballots were rejected during the June primary, representing 1.73% of all mail ballots returned.
That marks an increase from the 2024 primary, when 108,982 ballots were rejected, or 1.56% of all mail ballots cast.
The largest reason for rejection was ballots arriving too late to qualify under California law.
State data shows that 93,479 ballots were rejected because they failed to meet the state’s deadline requirements.
California allows mail ballots to arrive up to seven days after Election Day, provided they are postmarked on or before Election Day.
Voting experts believe many of the rejected ballots received postmarks dated after Election Day, making them ineligible to be counted even if they arrived within the seven-day grace period.
Kim Alexander, president of the nonpartisan California Voter Foundation, said the timing of postal processing appears to be a significant concern.
“Ballots rejected due to lateness are caused primarily to being postmarked too late to count, not because they arrived too late to count,” Alexander said.
Election experts have questioned whether recent operational changes within the U.S. Postal Service may be contributing to delayed postmarks.
Earlier this year, a group of mostly Democratic U.S. senators wrote to the Postal Service expressing concern that mail-processing changes could affect ballot handling during federal elections.
Updated Postal Service procedures mean postmarks may reflect when mail is processed at regional facilities rather than when it first enters the mail system.
Because processing centers have been consolidated in some areas, election officials have warned that postmark timing could be affected.
Before the June primary, California election officials encouraged voters to mail ballots as early as possible because of potential postal delays.
The June election also featured a highly competitive race for governor, which some experts believe encouraged many voters to wait until the final days before casting ballots.
In addition to late-arriving ballots, approximately 44,000 ballots were rejected because election officials determined the voter’s signature did not match the signature on file.
Another 8,300 ballots were rejected because the return envelope did not contain a signature.
State records also show that 743 ballots were rejected because those voters had already cast another ballot.
Other rejected ballots involved missing ballots inside return envelopes or multiple ballots submitted in a single envelope.
The highest rejection rate in the state occurred in Tulare County, where 3.52% of returned mail ballots were rejected.
Alpine County and Merced County followed closely, each recording rejection rates of 3.36%.
California has frequently faced criticism for taking weeks to complete vote counting after major elections, largely because state law permits ballots meeting certain requirements to continue arriving after Election Day.
Following the June primary, President Donald Trump again criticized California’s election system, while the Department of Justice opened an investigation into election administration in Los Angeles County.
Election experts emphasize that the increase in rejected ballots should not be interpreted as evidence of widespread voter fraud.
A 2025 report by the Brookings Institution found documented cases of mail ballot fraud remained extremely rare, estimating roughly four cases for every 10 million mail ballots cast, The Associated Press reported.
State officials have not identified evidence of widespread fraud connected to the June primary, but the increase in rejected ballots is expected to receive additional scrutiny as election administrators evaluate whether changes in postal operations, voter behavior or election procedures contributed to the higher rejection rate.
