In a bombshell revelation that’s sending shockwaves through Washington and igniting a political firestorm nationwide, FBI Director Kash Patel has accused Jamie Raskin, Co-Chairman of the January 6 Select Committee, of bribery, intimidation, and lies—uncovering a “treasure trove” of evidence that could dismantle the committee’s legacy and spark criminal charges. Patel, in a blistering statement Tuesday, declared Raskin’s actions “more than inappropriate—they’re criminal,” demanding a grand jury convene immediately to hear the case. If pursued, this could reshape narratives around January 6, expose deep-seated corruption, and divide the nation further in an already polarized post-election landscape.

Patel’s accusations came during a high-stakes press conference at FBI headquarters, where he laid out the findings from the J6 Unselect Committee Task Force—a special unit formed to probe the committee’s operations. “After much investigation, we’ve uncovered bribery, intimidation, and lies from none other than Committee Co-Chairman Jamie Raskin,” Patel stated, voice steady but eyes fierce. “His actions are more than inappropriate—they’re criminal.” The room fell into stunned silence as Patel detailed evidence allegedly showing Raskin pressuring witnesses, offering incentives for favorable testimony, and fabricating details to fit a narrative against former President Trump.

Có thể là hình ảnh về văn bản cho biết 'Celeb BuZZ MIR Daily'

The “treasure trove” includes leaked emails, witness affidavits, and financial records purportedly linking Raskin to undisclosed payments and threats aimed at shaping the committee’s report. “This wasn’t oversight—it was orchestration,” Patel charged. “Raskin abused power to intimidate and bribe, all while lying to the American people.” Sources say the task force’s probe, launched under the Trump administration, has been building for months, with Patel now pushing for a grand jury to indict.

Raskin’s office fired back swiftly: “These baseless smears are partisan revenge from a politicized FBI. Congressman Raskin has always pursued truth with integrity.” Allies like Rep. Adam Schiff called it “McCarthyism revived”: “Patel’s witch hunt targets those who defended democracy.” But Republicans rallied: “Finally—justice for J6 lies,” tweeted Rep. Jim Jordan.

The fallout exploded online, with #RaskinCorruption and #J6Truth trending worldwide as clips amassed millions of views. Supporters of Patel cheered “expose the deep state,” while critics decried “authoritarian overreach.” The nation split sharply: MAGA voices demanded arrests, progressives warned of “democracy’s death.”

Legal experts say if evidence holds, RICO or obstruction charges could follow: “This could be Watergate-level if proven,” one analyst noted. “Bribery in congressional probes? Career-ender.”

As grand jury looms, Patel’s move—rooted in his “America First” ethos—feels like reckoning.

Kash Patel didn’t just accuse.

He demanded justice.

And Washington trembles.

Jamie’s “criminal” actions exposed?

The truth unfolds—and America watches.

Acting AG Blanche Fires Back at Obama’s DOJ Criticism

Posted July 21, 2026

Former President Barack Obama sharply criticized the Trump administration this week over what he described as growing political influence inside the United States Department of Justice, prompting an aggressive response from Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche defending both the administration’s prosecutions and President Donald Trump’s authority over the executive branch.

The escalating public dispute comes as the Justice Department faces mounting scrutiny over a series of criminal investigations and indictments involving several longtime Trump critics and political adversaries, including former FBI Director James Comey.

Obama raised the issue during an interview with Stephen Colbert on CBS’ The Late Show with Stephen Colbert that aired Monday night.

“The White House shouldn’t be able to direct the attorney general to go around prosecuting whoever,” Obama said during the interview. “The idea is that the attorney general is the people’s lawyer. It’s not the president’s consigliere.”

Obama suggested the principle of DOJ independence may ultimately need to be codified into law by Congress, arguing that the justice system risks becoming politicized if presidents are perceived as directly targeting political opponents through federal prosecutions.

The comments immediately triggered pushback from the Trump administration.

White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson accused Obama of hypocrisy, arguing that his administration played a central role in the origins of the Trump-Russia investigation.

“Barack Hussein Obama is the king of weaponization,” Jackson said in a statement, referencing declassified documents related to the FBI’s Russia probe.

But the administration’s most extensive response came Wednesday from Blanche during an interview with CBS News in Phoenix.

Blanche forcefully rejected accusations that the DOJ is engaged in political retaliation and defended the president’s constitutional authority over the executive branch.

“Article Two says, ‘the executive power shall be vested in the President of the United States of America,’” Blanche said while holding a pocket copy of the Constitution during the interview. “It does not say that the Attorney General stands off to the side.”

Blanche emphasized that the attorney general serves within the executive branch and argued that presidents are fully entitled to direct priorities involving law enforcement, immigration, drugs, and national security.

“To the extent that President Trump calls me and says that he thinks we have a problem in this country, whether it’s the scourge of drugs, illegal immigration, every American wants him to do that,” Blanche said. “And he should.”

The acting attorney general also dismissed accusations that the DOJ is pursuing politically motivated cases against Trump critics.

“We are absolutely doing nothing but what we should be doing at the Department of Justice,” Blanche said. “I wake up with a very clean conscience every morning.”

The public clash comes amid multiple high-profile investigations involving Trump adversaries.

Most notably, Comey was recently indicted after prosecutors alleged a 2025 Instagram post featuring seashells arranged to form the numbers “86 47” constituted a threat against Trump, the 47th president. Prosecutors argue “86” is commonly understood slang meaning “to eliminate” or “get rid of.”

Blanche defended the case, arguing threats against the president must be treated seriously given recent assassination attempts and escalating political extremism.

Last year, Trump publicly urged then-Attorney General Pam Bondi to pursue prosecutions against Comey, James, and Sen. Adam Schiff, writing on social media that “JUSTICE MUST BE SERVED.”

Blanche declined to discuss private conversations with Trump when asked whether the president personally directed prosecutions.

“But rest assured,” Blanche said, “he has much better, bigger and important things to do than to worry about me doing my job.”

Blanche also turned Democrats’ criticism back against them by pointing to the multiple criminal prosecutions Trump himself faced before returning to office, including cases brought by state prosecutors in New York and Georgia as well as federal investigations overseen by Special Counsel Jack Smith.

“So I welcome criticism. Let’s go,” Blanche said. “But if you’re sitting in a glass house, you ought not throw stones.”