My husband, in order to get rid of me and take my money, hired three thugs: they pushed me from a height of thirty meters and then went down to retrieve my body, not even suspecting what was waiting for them below
My husband, in order to get rid of me and take my money, hired three thugs: they pushed me from a height of thirty meters and then went down to retrieve my body, not even suspecting what was waiting for them below
The wife began noticing changes long before everything happened. Her husband became cold and distant, often disappearing in the evenings and looking her in the eyes less and less.
He asked strange questions, as if casually: what would happen to her business if something happened to her, who would inherit the accounts, whether the insurance was in place, whether she had updated her documents. At first, the wife blamed it on stress, fatigue, or a crisis in their relationship, but the тревога inside her kept growing.
One day, when he wasn’t home, the woman accidentally saw a folder on his desk. Inside were documents for a life and health insurance policy in her name. The amount was so large that it took her breath away.
The documents bore her husband’s signature. At that moment, she realized this was no longer just a cooling-off period in their marriage. Her husband was planning something.
She didn’t make a scene. She didn’t let anything show.
She pretended she knew nothing. On their anniversary, her husband invited her on a date.
He was gentle and attentive, held her hand, and said the very words she hadn’t heard in a long time.
For a moment, the wife even allowed herself to think that perhaps it had all been her imagination. That her husband still loved her. He suggested going to the mountains, to a scenic cliff, to take beautiful photos as a keepsake.
The climb wasn’t easy; the wind was growing stronger, and thick fog was spreading around them. The wife stepped right up to the edge, admiring the view and feeling the cold air on her face. Her husband stood behind her. When she turned around, her husband was gone
In his place stood three muscular men dressed in dark clothes. They approached too quickly. The woman tried to step back and defend herself, but the odds were uneven.
One of the thugs grabbed her arm, the second shoved her in the shoulder, and the third held her so she couldn’t break free.
Just before her body was sent plunging from the high cliff, one of them leaned in and said almost calmly: — Enjoy your time in hell.
Greetings from your husband. After that, the woman remembered nothing. The husband was certain everything had gone according to plan.
The three men, after receiving their payment, began descending to make sure the body was truly lying at the foot of the cliff and that no evidence would remain.
But the thugs had no idea what horror awaited them below Continued in the first comment They didn’t know that several days before the trip, the wife had contacted a private security company and the police, handing over copies of the insurance documents and a recording of a conversation in which her husband discussed “solving the problem.”
She agreed to the mountain meeting only after a plan had been carefully arranged. Under her clothes, she wore a lightweight climbing harness hidden beneath her jacket. When she was pushed, the carabiner worked exactly as it was supposed to.
The fall was harsh; she struck the rock and lost consciousness, but she did not shatter. She was held by a rope that had been secured in advance on the opposite side of the ledge. When the men climbed down, they did not find a lifeless body.
Instead, they were met by police officers and a tactical unit who had been observing the entire scene from a nearby slope through optical equipment.
The recording had been made from several cameras.
The husband was already under surveillance at that moment and was arrested a few hours later.
He had expected to get her money and start a new life. But in the end, he lost everything
Nearly 150,000 California Mail Ballots Rejected In Primary
California election officials are examining why nearly 150,000 mail-in ballots were rejected during the state’s June primary, with late-arriving ballots accounting for most of the increase.
The higher rejection rate comes despite years of election law changes designed to make voting more accessible and ensure more ballots are ultimately counted.
According to data compiled by the California Secretary of State’s office, 148,241 mail-in ballots were rejected during the June primary, representing 1.73% of all mail ballots returned.
That marks an increase from the 2024 primary, when 108,982 ballots were rejected, or 1.56% of all mail ballots cast.
The largest reason for rejection was ballots arriving too late to qualify under California law.
State data shows that 93,479 ballots were rejected because they failed to meet the state’s deadline requirements.
California allows mail ballots to arrive up to seven days after Election Day, provided they are postmarked on or before Election Day.
Voting experts believe many of the rejected ballots received postmarks dated after Election Day, making them ineligible to be counted even if they arrived within the seven-day grace period.
Kim Alexander, president of the nonpartisan California Voter Foundation, said the timing of postal processing appears to be a significant concern.
“Ballots rejected due to lateness are caused primarily to being postmarked too late to count, not because they arrived too late to count,” Alexander said.
Election experts have questioned whether recent operational changes within the U.S. Postal Service may be contributing to delayed postmarks.
Earlier this year, a group of mostly Democratic U.S. senators wrote to the Postal Service expressing concern that mail-processing changes could affect ballot handling during federal elections.
Updated Postal Service procedures mean postmarks may reflect when mail is processed at regional facilities rather than when it first enters the mail system.
Because processing centers have been consolidated in some areas, election officials have warned that postmark timing could be affected.
Before the June primary, California election officials encouraged voters to mail ballots as early as possible because of potential postal delays.
The June election also featured a highly competitive race for governor, which some experts believe encouraged many voters to wait until the final days before casting ballots.
In addition to late-arriving ballots, approximately 44,000 ballots were rejected because election officials determined the voter’s signature did not match the signature on file.
Another 8,300 ballots were rejected because the return envelope did not contain a signature.
State records also show that 743 ballots were rejected because those voters had already cast another ballot.
Other rejected ballots involved missing ballots inside return envelopes or multiple ballots submitted in a single envelope.
The highest rejection rate in the state occurred in Tulare County, where 3.52% of returned mail ballots were rejected.
Alpine County and Merced County followed closely, each recording rejection rates of 3.36%.
California has frequently faced criticism for taking weeks to complete vote counting after major elections, largely because state law permits ballots meeting certain requirements to continue arriving after Election Day.
Following the June primary, President Donald Trump again criticized California’s election system, while the Department of Justice opened an investigation into election administration in Los Angeles County.
Election experts emphasize that the increase in rejected ballots should not be interpreted as evidence of widespread voter fraud.
A 2025 report by the Brookings Institution found documented cases of mail ballot fraud remained extremely rare, estimating roughly four cases for every 10 million mail ballots cast, The Associated Press reported.
State officials have not identified evidence of widespread fraud connected to the June primary, but the increase in rejected ballots is expected to receive additional scrutiny as election administrators evaluate whether changes in postal operations, voter behavior or election procedures contributed to the higher rejection rate.
