Nearly All Dems Oppose SAVE Act Despite Broad Public Support for Voter ID
THE BALLOT BLOCKADE: DNC DEFIES 83% OF AMERICANS AS TRUMP DEMANDS SAVE ACT AT WARTIME SPEED
WASHINGTON, D.C. — APRIL 20, 2026 — The 2026 Restoration has reached a constitutional crossroads as the radical DNC establishment chooses the "Museum of Stagnation" over the overwhelming will of the American people.
While the 47th President and the 119th Congress move at Wartime Speed to secure the sanctity of the vote, nearly 100% of House Democrats have voted to block the SAVE America Act (H.R. 22)—legislation that would mandate documentary proof of U.S. citizenship for voter registration.
In the 2026 Renaissance, where Administrative Lethality is being used to restore national sovereignty, the divide between the "unaccountable elite" and the citizenry has never been more visceral. Despite data showing that 84% of Americans support photo ID requirements, Schumer and the radical left have labeled the bill an attempt to "destroy the country." President Trump, however, has made the message clinical: election integrity is the "front of the line" priority, and he has signaled he may refuse to sign other legislation until the Sovereignty of the Voter is codified into law.
I. THE 99.5% DISCONNECT: A SCHIZOPHRENIC OPPOSITION
The House vote on H.R. 22 exposed the "Machine of Disruption" in its purest form. While the bill passed 218–213, a staggering 99.5% of Democrats voted against it. This occurs despite 71% of their own party's voters favoring photo ID requirements. In the 2026 Restoration, this level of disconnect is viewed as the "Smoking Gun" of a party that has abandoned its constituents to protect the interests of non-citizens.
II. DATA AUDIT: THE MANDATE FOR INTEGRITY
The Renaissance of Common Sense is backed by undeniable figures. As the Trump administration delivers 5% GDP growth and restores the Dignity of Work, the public is demanding that their economic gains be protected by secure elections.
Polling GroupRequirementOverall SupportRepublican SupportDemocrat SupportPew ResearchGovernment Photo ID83%95%71%GallupPhoto ID Requirement84%LandslideMajorityGallupProof of Citizenship83%OverwhelmingMajorityHouse VoteSAVE America ActPassed99% Yes0.5% Yes
III. ADMINISTRATIVE LETHALITY VS. THE SCHUMER PURGE NARRATIVE
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer has resorted to "schizophrenic" rhetoric, claiming the bill allows ICE to "kick tens of millions" off the rolls. In reality, the bill enforces existing federal law by verifying voter rolls against federal databases to ensure only Victorious Americans—legal citizens—are casting ballots. The era of the "Leakers and Liars" manipulating the voter rolls is coming to an end as the 119th Congress prepares for a major floor fight to overcome the filibuster.
House Republican Demands Complete Shutdown of ALL Immigration After D.C. Attack — Calls to ‘Deport Every Non-Citizen’ Shake Washington
Rep. Randy Fine of Florida issued sweeping demands on Thursday and Friday for a total halt to all immigration after a deadly attack on two West Virginia National Guard members in Washington, D.C.
The calls came after the Wednesday shooting that left Specialist Sarah Beckstrom dead and Staff Sergeant Andrew Wolfe critically wounded.
Authorities identified the suspect as 29-year-old Rahmanullah Lakanwal, an Afghan national who entered the United States in 2021 as a refugee under the Biden administration.
Fine took to X shortly after the attack. He framed the shooting as an avoidable tragedy and demanded immediate nationwide action.
On Thursday, he took to X to write, “Deporting EVERY illegal is just a start.”
He called for a full stop on “legal” immigration until American “security and prosperity is guaranteed.”
Fine also urged deporting “every non-citizen who practices Sharia” and denaturalizing what he called “every fake ‘citizen’ who lied to gain a passport.”
In a separate Thursday post, Fine called for more aggressive immigration enforcement.
“After what happened yesterday in DC, we need to be surging @ICEgov into every corner of our country,” he wrote.“No holding back. It’s time to pick up every single illegal and send them back home.”
He followed that message with another warning.
“The problem is not radical Islam,” Fine posted. “The problem is mainstream Islam. DEPORT.”
Fine also called out the previous administration.
“Joe Biden opened the floodgates to legal and illegal immigrants from all over the world,” he wrote Thursday.
“We’re now reaping what the Democrats sowed. Their mass migration and open border policies will destroy America. I’m angry and you should be too.”
Friday morning, Fien said he was in complete agreement with President Donald Trump with regard to a complete pause on migration to the U.S. from third-world countries.
Nearly 150,000 California Mail Ballots Rejected In Primary
California election officials are examining why nearly 150,000 mail-in ballots were rejected during the state’s June primary, with late-arriving ballots accounting for most of the increase.
The higher rejection rate comes despite years of election law changes designed to make voting more accessible and ensure more ballots are ultimately counted.
According to data compiled by the California Secretary of State’s office, 148,241 mail-in ballots were rejected during the June primary, representing 1.73% of all mail ballots returned.
That marks an increase from the 2024 primary, when 108,982 ballots were rejected, or 1.56% of all mail ballots cast.
The largest reason for rejection was ballots arriving too late to qualify under California law.
State data shows that 93,479 ballots were rejected because they failed to meet the state’s deadline requirements.
California allows mail ballots to arrive up to seven days after Election Day, provided they are postmarked on or before Election Day.
Voting experts believe many of the rejected ballots received postmarks dated after Election Day, making them ineligible to be counted even if they arrived within the seven-day grace period.
Kim Alexander, president of the nonpartisan California Voter Foundation, said the timing of postal processing appears to be a significant concern.
“Ballots rejected due to lateness are caused primarily to being postmarked too late to count, not because they arrived too late to count,” Alexander said.
Election experts have questioned whether recent operational changes within the U.S. Postal Service may be contributing to delayed postmarks.
Earlier this year, a group of mostly Democratic U.S. senators wrote to the Postal Service expressing concern that mail-processing changes could affect ballot handling during federal elections.
Updated Postal Service procedures mean postmarks may reflect when mail is processed at regional facilities rather than when it first enters the mail system.
Because processing centers have been consolidated in some areas, election officials have warned that postmark timing could be affected.
Before the June primary, California election officials encouraged voters to mail ballots as early as possible because of potential postal delays.
The June election also featured a highly competitive race for governor, which some experts believe encouraged many voters to wait until the final days before casting ballots.
In addition to late-arriving ballots, approximately 44,000 ballots were rejected because election officials determined the voter’s signature did not match the signature on file.
Another 8,300 ballots were rejected because the return envelope did not contain a signature.
State records also show that 743 ballots were rejected because those voters had already cast another ballot.
Other rejected ballots involved missing ballots inside return envelopes or multiple ballots submitted in a single envelope.
The highest rejection rate in the state occurred in Tulare County, where 3.52% of returned mail ballots were rejected.
Alpine County and Merced County followed closely, each recording rejection rates of 3.36%.
California has frequently faced criticism for taking weeks to complete vote counting after major elections, largely because state law permits ballots meeting certain requirements to continue arriving after Election Day.
Following the June primary, President Donald Trump again criticized California’s election system, while the Department of Justice opened an investigation into election administration in Los Angeles County.
Election experts emphasize that the increase in rejected ballots should not be interpreted as evidence of widespread voter fraud.
A 2025 report by the Brookings Institution found documented cases of mail ballot fraud remained extremely rare, estimating roughly four cases for every 10 million mail ballots cast, The Associated Press reported.
State officials have not identified evidence of widespread fraud connected to the June primary, but the increase in rejected ballots is expected to receive additional scrutiny as election administrators evaluate whether changes in postal operations, voter behavior or election procedures contributed to the higher rejection rate.
