News đShock in D.C.: President Donald Trump Shot AGAINâŠ
Shock spread across social media today after a series of viral posts falsely claimed that former U.S. President Donald Trump had been âshot againâ in Washington, D.C. The alarming wording rapidly gained traction online, leading to confusion, speculation, and widespread reactions from users across multiple platforms. Within a short time, however, it became clear that the claim was not supported by any credible evidence.
Secret Service. Likewise, no reputable news organizations have reported any such incident occurring in Washington, D. C.
, or anywhere else. In cases involving a former president, any legitimate security event would typically be verified quickly and reported through multiple trusted sources. The absence of such reporting strongly indicates that the viral claim is unfounded.
The rumor appears to have originated from unverified social media accounts and was amplified through misleading captions, edited clips, and recycled footage taken out of context. In several instances, unrelated videos were paired with dramatic descriptions suggesting a new attack had occurred. This type of content is often designed to maximize engagement rather than provide accurate information, and it can spread rapidly before fact-checking catches up.
Confusion was also influenced by reference to a real and widely reported incident in 2024, when Trump was injured during an assassination attempt at a rally in Butler, Pennsylvania. That event led to significant security measures, official investigations, and ongoing legal and political discussions.
Because it remains a high profile moment in recent political history, it is sometimes incorrectly referenced or distorted in later misinformation campaigns
Because it remains a high-profile moment in recent political history, it is sometimes incorrectly referenced or distorted in later misinformation campaigns.
Experts in media and digital communication warn that high profile political figures are frequent targets of false or exaggerated claims online Sensational headlines are especially effective at driving engagement, as they provoke strong emotional responses that encourage sharing before verification. In many cases, the objective behind such posts is to generate traffic, outrage, or political polarization rather than to report facts.
Authorities and analysts continue to stress the importance of verifying breaking news through established and reliable sources. Misinformation about violent incidents can create unnecessary public alarm and place additional strain on emergency response systems, even when the claims are entirely false.
At this time, all verified information confirms that Donald Trump has not been shot again in Washington, D
At this time, all verified information confirms that Donald Trump has not been shot again in Washington, D. C. , or elsewhere.
Officials continue to encourage the public to rely on credible reporting and official statements when assessing viral claims involving public safety.
This incident serves as a reminder of how quickly misinformation can spread in the digital age, and how essential careful verification has become in distinguishing factual reporting from online rumors
BREAKING NOW: 'National Emergency' Declared, Trump Called In
WASHINGTON, D.C. â Secretary of State Marco Rubio told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee that the United States has imposed a blockade preventing Iranian ships from transiting the Strait of Hormuz after Iran moved to restrict passage for other vessels.
Rubio stated that the measure has already cost Iran hundreds of millions of dollars in lost revenue. He said the decision followed Iranâs failure to reach an agreement on reopening the waterway to all shipping.
Rubio described the current talks with Iran as distinct from negotiations with other countries, noting that the Iranian decision-making process is slow and fragmented.
He said the regime has recently agreed to discuss aspects of its nuclear program that it had previously refused to address. At the same time, he indicated that U.S. patience is limited and that further progress is required on nuclear issues and the status of the Strait of Hormuz.
Iranian state media reported that Tehran had suspended talks with the United States, citing Israeli strikes on Hezbollah in Lebanon. President Trump stated on social media that negotiations between the two countries remain ongoing.
Rubioâs testimony did not directly address the Iranian media reports but emphasized that any agreement would need to include verifiable steps on Iranâs nuclear activities and the restoration of open passage through the Strait of Hormuz.
The blockade and the status of talks come as the United States continues to enforce export controls and sanctions related to Iranâs nuclear program and regional activities.
Administration officials have described the current approach as combining diplomatic engagement with measures to increase pressure on Tehran. Rubioâs remarks before the committee provided the most detailed public update on the status of the discussions in recent days.
The situation remains fluid, with both sides continuing to exchange messages through diplomatic channels. No timeline for further rounds of talks or specific next steps was announced during the hearing. Congressional committees are expected to continue monitoring developments related to Iran policy in the coming weeks.
Vote To Remove Minnesota Representative Ilhan Omar From Congress Being Considered By Republican Congressman
In a closely divided 5-3 vote that fell one short of the required threshold, Minnesota House Republicans failed to secure a subpoena compelling U.S. Rep. Ilhan Omar to testify and produce documents tied to the Feeding Our Future fraud scandal.
The outcome on May 5 marked the dramatic conclusion of months of mounting scrutiny over the congresswomanâs legislative actions and community outreach during the pandemic-era program at the center of one of the largest federal fraud investigations in recent Minnesota history. The House Fraud Prevention and State Agency Oversight Committee, operating under a bipartisan agreement that demands six votes to authorize a subpoena, saw every Republican member support the measure while all three Democrats opposed it.
Committee Chair Kristin Robbins (R-Maple Grove) argued that the subpoena had become the only remaining tool after Omar repeatedly declined invitations to appear and failed to respond to formal document requests.
âWe have reached out to Representative Ilhan Omar on multiple occasions, inviting her to testify and inviting and requesting documents,â Robbins said ahead of the vote. âThe only tool left for us as a committee if we want to get these documents is to issue a subpoena.â
Republicans on the panel have focused on Omarâs sponsorship of the federal MEALS Act, enacted in March 2020. They contend the legislation loosened critical oversight requirements in federal child nutrition programs and helped create the conditions that enabled large-scale fraud.
âRepresentative Omar had some role, whether inadvertent or not,â Robbins said. âShe passed the MEALS Act in March of 2020, and that took the guardrails off the federal school nutrition program which created the conditions for Feeding Our Future.â
The Feeding Our Future scandal stands as one of Minnesotaâs most significant public corruption cases in recent decades. Federal prosecutors allege that organizers and associates diverted hundreds of millions of dollars intended to feed low-income children through fabricated meal claims, shell nonprofit organizations, and fraudulent reimbursement requests. Dozens of individuals have been charged, including nonprofit founder Aimee Bock and multiple business operators connected to Minnesotaâs Somali community.
Committee Republicans specifically sought communications between Omarâs office and several individuals named in the federal investigation, along with records related to her public promotion of Safari Restaurant in Minneapolis, a business later linked to the scandal. Robbins also referenced a Somali-language television appearance in which Omar highlighted the restaurant as a meal distribution site during the pandemic.
âWe thought itâd be very helpful to understand from Rep. Omarâs perspective how she thought the MEALS Act impacted the community, why she brought it, what communication she had with the fraudsters,â Robbins said during the hearing.
Democrats on the committee strongly opposed the effort, accusing Republicans of politicizing the investigation and targeting Omar for partisan advantage. Dave Pinto, the committeeâs lead Democrat, questioned both the timing and practical purpose of pursuing a subpoena with only days remaining in the legislative session.
âEven if Omar were to testify or information is received, I do not see the committee doing anything with that information,â Pinto argued.
Pinto further referenced broader concerns about investigations involving political opponents under the current federal administration.
âWe know the president and federal administration have got no hesitation going after political enemies and investigating them in all sorts of ways,â he said during the hearing.
The failed vote effectively prevents the Minnesota House committee from compelling Omarâs testimony or documents before the legislative session ends later this month. Nevertheless, Robbins signaled that Republicans are exploring alternative avenues to continue the pursuit.
âTheyâre fading,â Robbins said. âBut Iâll certainly talk to our friends in Congress to see if they would be willing to issue a subpoena.â
Robbins noted that federal authorities retain âa whole menu of legal optionsâ because Omar is a sitting member of Congress. The controversy unfolds amid broader Republican efforts at both state and national levels to highlight waste, fraud, and inadequate oversight in federal spending programs enacted during the COVID-19 pandemic.
"SAD NEWS: JUST 30 MINUTES AGOIN WASHINGTON, D.C. TRUMP WAS CONFIRMEDAS... THE NATION CAN'T BELIEVE IT SEE MORE IN THE COMMENTS BELOW" đ
Trumpâs Silent Moment in Washington: A Pause That Said It All
WASHINGTON, D.C. â In a city where every word is analyzed and every gesture is scrutinized, one brief moment of silence from President Donald Trump has become the focus of intense public discussion.
The unexpected pause occurred during a high-profile appearance in Washington on Thursday afternoon. Standing before a crowd of supporters, officials, and members of the media, Trump appeared ready to deliver another energetic address. Instead, he stopped for several seconds, looking out across the room before continuing with his remarks.
While the pause lasted only a short time, it quickly captured national attention.
Within minutes, social media platforms were flooded with videos of the moment. Supporters described it as a powerful and reflective pause, while critics and political commentators debated its significance. Some viewed it as a rare glimpse of contemplation from a political figure known for his fast-paced speaking style.
Observers noted that the atmosphere inside the venue changed noticeably during the silence. Conversations stopped. Cameras remained fixed on the president. Audience members appeared uncertain about what would come next.
"It was one of those moments where everyone seemed to hold their breath," said one attendee. "Nobody knew exactly what he was thinking, but it felt important."
Political analysts have offered differing interpretations. Some suggested that Trump was simply gathering his thoughts before addressing a complex issue. Others argued that the pause reflected the weight of ongoing national debates surrounding the economy, immigration, and foreign policy.
Regardless of the reason, the moment demonstrated how closely the public follows every move made by one of the most recognizable political figures in modern American history.
The president later continued his speech without mentioning the pause, focusing instead on his administration's priorities and future goals. However, the brief silence had already become one of the most talked-about aspects of the event.
Communication experts say moments like these can sometimes have a greater impact than carefully prepared statements.
"In politics, silence can be as meaningful as words," explained one public relations specialist. "People naturally try to interpret what isn't being said. That's why these moments often generate enormous attention."
By the evening, clips of the pause had been viewed millions of times online. News outlets across the country featured the footage, and commentators continued debating whether the moment carried a deeper message or was simply an ordinary break in a lengthy speech.
For many Americans, the answer may never be fully known.
Yet in a political environment dominated by constant headlines, heated debates, and nonstop commentary, one thing is clear: a few seconds of silence were enough to capture the nation's attention.
Sometimes the loudest statement is the one that isn't spoken at all.
