🎬 PART 2: «The Name He Was Never Supposed to Say»
“Him!”
The boy’s finger locked on the older man.
The courtroom fell dead silent.
For one terrible second, nobody moved. The older man just stood there, his hand still half-raised from trying to stop the child, his face draining of color.
The maid’s sob caught in her throat.
The boy stumbled one step back, breathing hard, but he did not lower his hand.
“He pushed her,” he said, voice shaking. “She tried to stop him from hurting me.”
A murmur broke through the gallery. Spectators leaned forward, stunned, trying to process what they had just heard.
The older man forced a smile that looked ugly and weak.
“He’s confused,” he snapped. “He’s a frightened child.”
The boy’s eyes filled even more.
“I’m not confused,” he whispered.
Then he reached into his pocket with shaking fingers and pulled out a dark polished button.
It trembled in his hand.
“It came off when he grabbed me.”
All eyes dropped to the older man’s jacket.
One button was missing.
The maid covered her mouth again, crying harder now, because the truth she had tried to bury was standing in front of everyone.
The older man took a step back.
The boy looked at the maid, devastated.
“She told me to run,” he said. “She said if I stayed, he’d hurt me too.”
That destroyed the room.
The maid folded into herself, sobbing openly. The spectators stared at the older man with growing horror. The power he had walked in with was gone now, stripped away by a child who had decided fear was no longer heavier than guilt.
The judge leaned forward sharply.
And for the first time since the maid had been dragged to the center of that courtroom, she was no longer standing there alone.
The boy looked at her through tears and said the one thing she had not expected anyone to give her.
“I won’t let them blame you anymore.”
Nearly 150,000 California Mail Ballots Rejected In Primary
California election officials are examining why nearly 150,000 mail-in ballots were rejected during the state’s June primary, with late-arriving ballots accounting for most of the increase.
The higher rejection rate comes despite years of election law changes designed to make voting more accessible and ensure more ballots are ultimately counted.
According to data compiled by the California Secretary of State’s office, 148,241 mail-in ballots were rejected during the June primary, representing 1.73% of all mail ballots returned.
That marks an increase from the 2024 primary, when 108,982 ballots were rejected, or 1.56% of all mail ballots cast.
The largest reason for rejection was ballots arriving too late to qualify under California law.
State data shows that 93,479 ballots were rejected because they failed to meet the state’s deadline requirements.
California allows mail ballots to arrive up to seven days after Election Day, provided they are postmarked on or before Election Day.
Voting experts believe many of the rejected ballots received postmarks dated after Election Day, making them ineligible to be counted even if they arrived within the seven-day grace period.
Kim Alexander, president of the nonpartisan California Voter Foundation, said the timing of postal processing appears to be a significant concern.
“Ballots rejected due to lateness are caused primarily to being postmarked too late to count, not because they arrived too late to count,” Alexander said.
Election experts have questioned whether recent operational changes within the U.S. Postal Service may be contributing to delayed postmarks.
Earlier this year, a group of mostly Democratic U.S. senators wrote to the Postal Service expressing concern that mail-processing changes could affect ballot handling during federal elections.
Updated Postal Service procedures mean postmarks may reflect when mail is processed at regional facilities rather than when it first enters the mail system.
Because processing centers have been consolidated in some areas, election officials have warned that postmark timing could be affected.
Before the June primary, California election officials encouraged voters to mail ballots as early as possible because of potential postal delays.
The June election also featured a highly competitive race for governor, which some experts believe encouraged many voters to wait until the final days before casting ballots.
In addition to late-arriving ballots, approximately 44,000 ballots were rejected because election officials determined the voter’s signature did not match the signature on file.
Another 8,300 ballots were rejected because the return envelope did not contain a signature.
State records also show that 743 ballots were rejected because those voters had already cast another ballot.
Other rejected ballots involved missing ballots inside return envelopes or multiple ballots submitted in a single envelope.
The highest rejection rate in the state occurred in Tulare County, where 3.52% of returned mail ballots were rejected.
Alpine County and Merced County followed closely, each recording rejection rates of 3.36%.
California has frequently faced criticism for taking weeks to complete vote counting after major elections, largely because state law permits ballots meeting certain requirements to continue arriving after Election Day.
Following the June primary, President Donald Trump again criticized California’s election system, while the Department of Justice opened an investigation into election administration in Los Angeles County.
Election experts emphasize that the increase in rejected ballots should not be interpreted as evidence of widespread voter fraud.
A 2025 report by the Brookings Institution found documented cases of mail ballot fraud remained extremely rare, estimating roughly four cases for every 10 million mail ballots cast, The Associated Press reported.
State officials have not identified evidence of widespread fraud connected to the June primary, but the increase in rejected ballots is expected to receive additional scrutiny as election administrators evaluate whether changes in postal operations, voter behavior or election procedures contributed to the higher rejection rate.
