Republicans Surge in Early Voting in California Primary
There’s been some major movement less than one month before the primary elections in California, and it has Democrats worried.
The California Secretary of State’s office has released the official report on the number of ballots returned so far in the June primary.
Supreme Court delivers maor midterm election decision
The data shows that Republicans are surging so far, stoking fear among Democrats ahead of the June 2 primaries in the deep blue state.
The report shows the Republican share of “early” voters in California has spiked and is running more than 9 percent above voter registration.
Supreme Court blockbuster ruling months before midterms
The report also shows that Democratic turnout is way down. Below is a breakdown of the numbers:
–Democrat Share of Early Ballot Returns
41% (down 7% from 2022)
–Republican Share of Early Ballot Returns
34% (up 8% from 2022)
–Independent Share of Early Ballot Returns
25% (up 2% from 2022)
Assemblymember Carl DeMaio, a San Diego Republican, cautioned against over-interpreting the numbers but said the trend is encouraging for conservatives.
“When you take a look at the numbers, both in comparison to the numbers four years ago and voter registration, Democrats are way down and Republicans are up in early voting,” DeMaio told The Post.
“It may mean that many Democrats are taking longer to decide on the governor’s race and who ultimately they want to lead,” DeMaio added.
Paul Mitchell with Political Data Inc. noted that it’s still early in the election period.
“The early days part is important because some of what we’re seeing is which counties are quicker at returning the data to us,” Mitchell said.
While that is true, older, conservative voters and landlords who are Republicans have voted more than any other party.
4.3% of people aged 65 and up went to the polls. People aged 50 to 64 made up 2%, people aged 35 to 49 made up 1.1%, and people aged 18 to 34 made up 0.7%.
“It’s kind of typical of a low-turnout election that these are the people that always vote in every election. They probably almost always vote early, and they’re getting their ballots in right away,” Mitchell said.
The tracker shows that 2.6% of votes were white, making them the most common racial group. 2.3% were Asian, 1.6% were Black, and 1.2% were Latino.
Mitchell said that the patterns seen in early voting don’t always hold up at the end of the voting process.
“We see these patterns where some voters still want to vote at the polls,” he said, noting older Latinos in particular.
Mitchell said that in the past, older voters were some of the first to use mail-in ballots, and a lot of those early users were Republicans.
“We did see some stuff in 2020 when Republicans and the Trump administration said ‘Don’t vote by mail,’ where that started to drop off. But it seems like it might be returning,” he said.
Mitchell also said that the primary races for governor are usually the ones with the fewest voters. He said that most people turn in their ballots at the end of the election term.
For people in rural areas who want to make sure their ballots are stamped in time to be counted, the Postal Service tells them to vote at least a week before they mail them back.
People are paying close attention to the race for governor.
For the Democrats, former U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra, progressive billionaire Tom Steyer, and former Orange County congresswoman Katie Porter are at the top of the field. In recent weeks, San Jose Mayor Matt Mahan and former Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa have been more negative.
Steve Hilton, a former Fox News host, seems to have a strong lead over Chad Bianco for sheriff of Riverside County on the Republican side.
Most polls show that Becerra and Hilton are the most likely candidates to make it out of the state’s “jungle” primary system.
This system doesn’t care about party membership and has made people on both sides of the political spectrum nervous about not making it to the November runoff.
IT'S TIME FOR A CHANGE — Nightmare Brewing for Hakeem Jeffries as He Could Be OUT After Facing Heat From Dems...
Washington, D.C. - June 3, 2026
Hakeem Jeffries Encounters Growing Reluctance from Democratic Candidates to Back His Leadership
Washington, D.C. — House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) is facing increasing resistance from Democratic candidates who are declining to commit to supporting his leadership if the party regains the House majority in November.
A significant number of viable Democratic challengers have indicated to Axios that voting for Jeffries as speaker would not be automatic. Last fall, more than 80 Democratic House candidates expressed uncertainty or outright opposition to his continued leadership. The situation has worsened in recent months.
Mai Vang, a progressive primary challenger to Rep. Doris Matsui (D-Calif.), previously offered a noncommittal response about supporting whoever her future colleagues choose. In a more recent statement, she directly criticized Jeffries and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer.
“The Democratic Party and its leadership—Chuck Schumer and Hakeem Jeffries—have failed to mobilize meaningful opposition to Trump’s illegal war and their silence as AIPAC and corporations flood Congressional primaries with millions of dollars is deafening,” Vang said.
Claire Valdez, a New York State Assembly member running to replace retiring Rep. Nydia Velázquez (D-N.Y.), told Axios that supporting Jeffries would require “some conversations” first.
Other candidates have proposed alternatives. Anabel Mendoza, a progressive running in Illinois’ 7th District, said she would prefer Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.) in the leadership role because she is “10 toes down on what matters.”
Some candidates noted that conversations about Jeffries’ future would likely change significantly if Democrats fail to win the House.
Jeffries is also confronting a sharply deteriorating redistricting environment. After initial Democratic optimism following a Virginia referendum victory aimed at gaining up to four seats, recent legal and political developments have turned against the party. In a worst-case scenario, Democrats could lose as many as 10 seats due to aggressive Republican redistricting and court rulings.
Florida Republicans advanced a congressional map that could eliminate up to four Democratic seats, surprising even some GOP observers. Virginia’s Supreme Court has signaled it may overturn the Democrats’ hard-won referendum win. The Supreme Court’s decision in Louisiana v. Callais has created new opportunities for Republicans in several Southern states.
In Tennessee, GOP lawmakers have circulated a map targeting Rep. Steve Cohen’s Memphis seat. Louisiana Republicans are positioned to reduce Democratic representation in the state. Alabama officials are seeking to lift an injunction protecting the current map. South Carolina is considering a map that would eliminate Rep. Jim Clyburn’s deeply blue seat. Mississippi Gov. Tate Reeves has expressed interest in challenging Rep. Bennie Thompson.
While some maps remain subject to legal challenges and Democrats hope to compete in certain districts, the overall trajectory has shifted against the party. The combination of internal leadership doubts and unfavorable redistricting has created substantial uncertainty for Jeffries and House Democrats heading into the midterms.
