Savannah Guthrie’s unwavering belief in her brother-in-law is being weighed against the shocking details of Nancy’s kidnapping.
Savannah Guthrie’s unwavering belief in her brother-in-law is being weighed against the shocking details of Nancy’s kidnapping. Public opinion is witnessing a direct confrontation between familial affection and brutal criminal suspicions. Through Megyn Kelly’s scathing revelations, the “extremely angry” attitude of the powerful TV host Savannah Guthrie in defending Tommaso Cioni is creating a huge wave of skepticism. Her assertion that she “doesn’t believe” her brother-in-law has any involvement in Nancy’s disappearance is not simply a defense, but seems to be a high-stakes gamble on her personal reputation and illustrious journalistic career.
Meghan Kelly claims Savannah Guthrie is ‘livid’ over reports about her brother-in-law.Megyn Kelly/YouTube, Faaebook
Megyn Kelly claims Savannah Guthrie remains furious over reports that her brother-in-law is allegedly a “prime suspect” in her missing mother Nancy’s disappearance, RadarOnline.com can reveal.
The conservative firebrand said she’s unsure if the Today co-host plans to sue journalist Ashleigh Banfield over the report, but claimed that Savannah stands by Tommaso Cioni’s innocence.
Savannah Guthrie ‘Does Not Suspect Her Brother-in-Law’
Megyn Kelly dropped her latest bombshell about the Nancy Guthrie investigation.Megyn Kelly/YouTube
“I have not been able to confirm that the Guthrie family wants to sue Ashleigh Banfield, but I have confirmed that Savannah is livid about that report and definitely does not suspect her or her brother-in-law. Can you blame her?” Kelly asked on the March 12 episode of her SiriusXM show.
“I mean, that of course, she loves her sister. I’m sure she loves her brother-in-law, and I’m sure she genuinely doesn’t believe they had anything to do with it,” the host continued about Annie Guthrie and Cioni, who were the last people to see Nancy after having dinner with her on January 31.
The ailing grandmother was dropped off at her Tucson, Arizona, home by “relatives” that evening and was forcibly taken from her bed in the early morning hours of February 1. She hasn’t been seen or heard from since.
Ashleigh Banfield Stood by Her Reporting About Tommaso Cioni
Tommasso Cioni and Annie Guthrie were the last people to see Nancy Guthrie before her abduction.Facebook
Kelly went on to share how she and Banfield have been looking at the kidnapping case from different perspectives, as well as what their own sources have told them.
Back in early February, the former NBC News correspondent said that she had an “impeccable” law enforcement source telling her that Cioni “is maybe a prime suspect in this case,” during her Drop Dead Serious podcast.
Banfield continued to double down in the weeks that followed, saying her source told her she was “over the target” about Cioni, while Kelly’s own insiders said that she was onto something about Savannah’s brother-in-law.
“All of us are in a different boat. You know, we have to be more objective in assessing the possible suspects and the people connected with it, and law enforcement certainly does,” Kelly maintained on her latest episode.
A United Front
The trio gathered to lay flowers at Nancy’s ‘memorial’ before Savannah Guthrie went back to NYC.@BrianEntin/X
Savannah demonstrated her continued solidarity with Annie and Cioni as the trio visited a makeshift tribute to Nancy in front of her house on March 2.
They laid yellow flowers and left a personal note in what was the siblings’ first public appearance since their mother vanished.
Savannah flew back to New York the following day after spending more than a month in Tucson.
‘We Believe That It Was a Targeted’ Abduction
Pima County Sheriff Chris Nanos’ contradicted himself several times in his latest interview. TODAY/YouTube
Weeks after Nancy’s disappearance, law enforcement appear to have no new major leads. Initial “ransom” notes were never confirmed to be legitimate, and the suspect in a ski mask caught by a Nest doorbell camera has yet to be identified.
Bumbling Pima County Sheriff Chris Nanos only added to the confusion in a March 12 interview with NBC News.
“We believe we know why [the kidnapper] did this, and we believe that it was targeted, but we’re not 100% sure of that,” he shared, but did not clarify with any further details.
'Guilty Of Fraud' - Hammer Dropped On Former First Lady Jill Biden During Live Fox News Segment
McEnany Accuses Jill Biden Of Misleading Americans About Debate Performance
Posted July 15, 2026
Former White House press secretary and Fox News host Kayleigh McEnany accused former first lady Jill Biden of misleading the American public about President Joe Biden’s condition following his widely criticized debate performance during the 2024 campaign.
McEnany made the remarks Thursday during an appearance on Fox News Channel’s “America’s Newsroom,” where she reacted to comments Jill Biden reportedly made in her upcoming book regarding the president’s performance during the debate that ultimately intensified questions about his age and fitness for office.
The discussion began when co-host Dana Perino referenced remarks Jill Biden made immediately following the debate.
At a campaign event after the debate, Jill Biden praised her husband’s performance.
“Joe, you did such a great job. You answered every question,” she said at the time.
Perino contrasted those comments with more recent claims attributed to Jill Biden and raised questions about the apparent inconsistency.
“So now we know that this is what she’s saying in her book,” Perino said. “And the question I would love to ask her is where are you lying then or now?”
McEnany responded by arguing that Jill Biden’s reaction following the debate was inconsistent with her more recent descriptions of the event.
“It’s a great question,” McEnany said.
“That is not the reaction of someone who believes they just watched their husband have a stroke. It is an absolute lie.”
McEnany then accused the former first lady of concealing concerns about the president’s condition from voters.
“It was fraud,” she said.
“What she did fraud on the American public and she’s continuing it by saying she had never seen him like that before or after.”
The debate between Biden and President Donald Trump became a turning point in the 2024 election cycle, with many Democrats publicly expressing concern about Biden’s performance and his ability to continue his campaign.
Questions about Biden’s age and mental sharpness had circulated for years, but the debate intensified those concerns and fueled calls from some Democrats for him to step aside.
During the Fox News discussion, McEnany referenced comments previously made by veteran journalist Carl Bernstein regarding Biden’s condition behind the scenes.
“Dana, you all remember Carl Bernstein, who said he talked to people who knew Joe Biden, loved Joe Biden, supported Joe Biden, and they were adamant that what we saw was not a one-off,” McEnany said.
According to McEnany, Bernstein reported that individuals close to Biden had observed similar episodes before the debate.
“They said it had happened 15 or 20 times prior, him losing his train of thought,” she said.
McEnany also cited a fundraiser Bernstein reportedly described.
“He described a fundraiser where he froze up and seemed to have some type of rigor mortis,” she said.
“This is not something that was a one-off.”
McEnany argued that concerns about Biden’s condition were widely known among those close to him.
“This was well known,” she said.
She then questioned why Jill Biden continued publicly defending her husband following the debate.
“So why did she keep up with the fraud on the American people?” McEnany asked.
The former first lady has repeatedly defended her husband and rejected claims that she or members of his inner circle concealed concerns about his health, Breitbart News reported.
The debate over Biden’s condition became one of the defining political stories of the 2024 election cycle and continued after he ultimately left the race.
McEnany’s comments reflect ongoing scrutiny surrounding what Biden’s family, advisers and top Democratic officials knew about his condition and when they knew it.
Neither Jill Biden nor representatives for the former president immediately responded to McEnany’s latest remarks.
As new books and accounts from those involved continue to emerge, questions surrounding Biden’s final campaign and the decisions made by those closest to him remain a major topic of political debate.
