SCOTUS COULD END IT — Justices Poised to Stop California Elections Nightmare
Washington, D.C. - June 8, 2026
Supreme Court Considers Challenge to State Laws Allowing Post-Election Day Ballot Receipt
The U.S. Supreme Court is weighing a case that could reshape how states administer federal elections by determining whether ballots mailed by Election Day but received afterward must be counted. The case, Watson v. Republican National Committee, centers on a Mississippi law permitting absentee ballots postmarked by Election Day to be counted if received within five business days.
Case Background and Procedural History
Mississippi enacted House Bill 1521 in 2020, creating a grace period for late-arriving absentee ballots during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Republican National Committee and other plaintiffs challenged the law in 2024, arguing it conflicts with federal statutes that establish a single national Election Day for presidential, Senate, and House contests.
A federal district court initially upheld Mississippi’s policy. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit later ruled that federal election law preempts the state’s post-Election Day receipt window. Mississippi appealed, and the Supreme Court agreed to hear the case.
Oral arguments took place in March. A decision is expected before the end of the Court’s current term this month.
Arguments Presented
Challengers contend that federal law requires ballots to be received by Election Day to be counted in federal races. They argue that allowing later receipt undermines the uniform national Election Day established by Congress.
Mississippi officials and supporters of the law maintain that states hold primary authority over election administration. They assert that ballots cast by Election Day should remain valid even if delayed by postal service issues beyond the voter’s control.
During oral arguments, justices focused on the interpretation of federal statutes setting a single Election Day. Observers noted extensive questioning about whether post-Election Day receipt aligns with congressional intent.
Potential Nationwide Impact
Approximately 15 states and the District of Columbia currently permit at least some ballots to arrive after Election Day if they meet postmark requirements. California allows mail ballots postmarked by Election Day to be counted if received within seven days.
A ruling in favor of the challengers could require states to adopt a uniform receipt deadline of Election Day for federal elections. Proponents say this would create clearer standards and shorten the period during which outcomes remain unresolved.
Opponents warn that such a ruling could disenfranchise voters whose ballots experience unavoidable postal delays.
Broader Implications
The case has drawn significant attention because its outcome could affect election procedures in multiple states ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. Election officials, political parties, and advocacy groups are monitoring developments closely.
A decision upholding Mississippi’s law would preserve state flexibility on ballot receipt deadlines. A ruling against the law would likely compel revisions in states with similar grace periods and establish a nationwide standard for when ballots must be received in federal contests.
The dispute highlights ongoing debates over balancing election security, uniformity, and access. The Supreme Court’s ruling, expected by the end of June, could set precedent governing ballot deadlines for years to come.
Nearly 150,000 California Mail Ballots Rejected In Primary
California election officials are examining why nearly 150,000 mail-in ballots were rejected during the state’s June primary, with late-arriving ballots accounting for most of the increase.
The higher rejection rate comes despite years of election law changes designed to make voting more accessible and ensure more ballots are ultimately counted.
According to data compiled by the California Secretary of State’s office, 148,241 mail-in ballots were rejected during the June primary, representing 1.73% of all mail ballots returned.
That marks an increase from the 2024 primary, when 108,982 ballots were rejected, or 1.56% of all mail ballots cast.
The largest reason for rejection was ballots arriving too late to qualify under California law.
State data shows that 93,479 ballots were rejected because they failed to meet the state’s deadline requirements.
California allows mail ballots to arrive up to seven days after Election Day, provided they are postmarked on or before Election Day.
Voting experts believe many of the rejected ballots received postmarks dated after Election Day, making them ineligible to be counted even if they arrived within the seven-day grace period.
Kim Alexander, president of the nonpartisan California Voter Foundation, said the timing of postal processing appears to be a significant concern.
“Ballots rejected due to lateness are caused primarily to being postmarked too late to count, not because they arrived too late to count,” Alexander said.
Election experts have questioned whether recent operational changes within the U.S. Postal Service may be contributing to delayed postmarks.
Earlier this year, a group of mostly Democratic U.S. senators wrote to the Postal Service expressing concern that mail-processing changes could affect ballot handling during federal elections.
Updated Postal Service procedures mean postmarks may reflect when mail is processed at regional facilities rather than when it first enters the mail system.
Because processing centers have been consolidated in some areas, election officials have warned that postmark timing could be affected.
Before the June primary, California election officials encouraged voters to mail ballots as early as possible because of potential postal delays.
The June election also featured a highly competitive race for governor, which some experts believe encouraged many voters to wait until the final days before casting ballots.
In addition to late-arriving ballots, approximately 44,000 ballots were rejected because election officials determined the voter’s signature did not match the signature on file.
Another 8,300 ballots were rejected because the return envelope did not contain a signature.
State records also show that 743 ballots were rejected because those voters had already cast another ballot.
Other rejected ballots involved missing ballots inside return envelopes or multiple ballots submitted in a single envelope.
The highest rejection rate in the state occurred in Tulare County, where 3.52% of returned mail ballots were rejected.
Alpine County and Merced County followed closely, each recording rejection rates of 3.36%.
California has frequently faced criticism for taking weeks to complete vote counting after major elections, largely because state law permits ballots meeting certain requirements to continue arriving after Election Day.
Following the June primary, President Donald Trump again criticized California’s election system, while the Department of Justice opened an investigation into election administration in Los Angeles County.
Election experts emphasize that the increase in rejected ballots should not be interpreted as evidence of widespread voter fraud.
A 2025 report by the Brookings Institution found documented cases of mail ballot fraud remained extremely rare, estimating roughly four cases for every 10 million mail ballots cast, The Associated Press reported.
State officials have not identified evidence of widespread fraud connected to the June primary, but the increase in rejected ballots is expected to receive additional scrutiny as election administrators evaluate whether changes in postal operations, voter behavior or election procedures contributed to the higher rejection rate.
