Supreme Court Likely To Revive Obama-Era Rule on Asylum-Seekers
The U.S. Supreme Court recently agreed to reevaluate a longstanding immigration policy that denied asylum seekers entry at ports along the southern U.S. border. President Donald Trump requested the justices to review a Ninth Circuit ruling that deemed the policy unlawful.
The Biden administration terminated the practice referred to by the government as “metering.” The Trump administration seeks to maintain flexibility while intensifying its immigration enforcement efforts.
U.S. Solicitor General John Sauer stated, “The Constitution assigns the authority to regulate the border to the political branches, rather than the judiciary. The decision below improperly undermines Congress’s authority to establish asylum policy, referencing its ties to active policies. It also ‘significantly encroaches upon the executive branch’s authority to regulate the nation’s borders.'”
The nonprofit immigrant rights organization, Al Otro Lado, in conjunction with 13 asylum-seekers who initiated the lawsuit central to the dispute in 2017, expressed their endorsement of the Ninth Circuit’s ruling and are ready to uphold it before the Supreme Court.
“The government’s turnback policy constituted an unlawful strategy to evade these obligations by physically obstructing asylum-seekers at ports of entry and hindering their ability to cross the border for protection,” stated attorneys for Al Otro Lado and the asylum-seekers. “At-risk families, children, and adults escaping persecution were left in hazardous circumstances, where they encountered violent attacks, abduction, and mortality.”
Sauer stated, “According to the rationale of the decision below, [Customs and Border Patrol] was prohibited from obstructing the entry of an individual who arrived at the border without a prior appointment.” An alien could assert that he has arrived ‘in the United States,’ thereby necessitating government inspection and processing of his asylum application, which would enable him to circumvent the queue.
The asylum-seekers contested the government’s petition, asserting that the appellate court’s decision pertained solely to a specific group of migrants.
Kelsi Brown Corkran, an attorney with the Institute for Constitutional Advocacy and Protection at Georgetown Law, stated, “While the current administration’s border policies are subject to impending legal challenges, none of the plaintiffs’ assertions in those cases hinge on the issue raised by the petition here.” The court’s determination of the issue at hand would consequently constitute little more than an advisory opinion.
The Justice Department refrained from commenting on the Supreme Court’s decision to consider its appeal. The White House directed inquiries regarding the reinstatement of the metering policy to the Department of Homeland Security, which did not respond to questions concerning the potential revival of the policy by the Trump administration.
“Our attorneys have unequivocally articulated that the Trump administration has consistently upheld the explicit interpretation of federal law and fundamental logic in this matter from the outset,” Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin stated in an email that contained a link to the government’s petition. “We anticipate presenting our case to the Supreme Court.”
The Immigration and Nationality Act stipulates that individuals in the United States, irrespective of their location, have the right to apply for asylum if they can establish a well-founded fear of persecution in their home country.
In 2016, in response to an influx of Haitian asylum-seekers at San Ysidro port of entry in Southern California, the Obama administration mandated that border agents refuse entry to newly arriving migrants.
Two years later, the Department of Homeland Security formally instituted the policy, supplying all southern border ports with “metering guidance.”
Under the 2018 policy, border agents were assigned the responsibility of identifying prospective asylum-seekers and actively obstructing their entry into U.S. territory.
In 2019, the Trump administration implemented a new barrier for migrants, declaring that individuals who traversed one or more countries prior to reaching the U.S. would be disqualified from asylum unless they had first pursued protection in at least one of those transit countries.
A lower court has certified a class for asylum seekers who arrived prior to Trump’s transit rule, issuing an injunction that reinstates claims previously denied under the 2019 policy.
The class facilitated the advancement of the case subsequent to the Biden administration’s abrogation of the metering policy in 2021. The transit rule was ultimately rescinded in 2023.
In 2022, the lower court issued a definitive ruling, imposing a permanent injunction that barred the government from enforcing the asylum prohibitions against that particular group. The court confirmed that individuals in this category possessed the right to seek asylum in accordance with prior policy directives.
The Trump administration urged the Supreme Court to reverse the ruling, arguing that alternative solutions, like the Biden-era CBP One app designed for asylum appointment scheduling for migrants, could be at risk.
"A Poor Boy Lost His Only Sandwich… But What Happened Next Left Everyone Speechless!
"A Poor Boy Lost His Only Sandwich… But What Happened Next Left Everyone Speechless!
Posted July 14, 2026
It wasn't fresh.
The bread was slightly crushed.
But to Ethan it looked like treasure.
He carefully brushed dirt from the wrapper.
For a moment he simply stared at it.
He imagined taking small bites.
Making it last.
Pretending he was eating in a real home at a real kitchen table.
A place he barely remembered.
His mother had died three years earlier.
His father had disappeared long before that.
Since then Ethan had survived however he could.
Some nights he found shelter.
Some nights he didn't.
But today felt different.
Today he had food.
Today he could stop thinking about hunger.
At least for a little while.
He carried the sandwich carefully through town.
Protecting it like something precious.
Eventually he reached the front of Westbridge Academy.
The school fascinated him.
Every morning he watched students laughing with friends.
He imagined what it might be like to wear a uniform.
To sit in a classroom.
To have teachers.
Homework.
A future.
Things ordinary children complained about.
Things Ethan dreamed of.
He sat near the gate and slowly unwrapped the sandwich.
His hands trembled.
The smell alone made his stomach ache.
He smiled.
A real smile.
Perhaps the first in weeks.
Then fate intervened.
A black SUV rolled past the curb.
The driver accelerated slightly.
A gust of wind swept across the sidewalk.
The sandwich slipped from Ethan's hands.
"No!"
He lunged for it.
Too late.
The sandwich hit the pavement.
The wrapper burst open.
The food scattered across the dirty concrete.
Ethan froze.
His entire body became still.
For a moment he simply stared.
His breakfast.
His lunch.
Perhaps his only meal for the day.
Gone.
A lump formed in his throat.
Tears burned behind his eyes.
He tried not to cry.
Boys his age were supposed to be strong.
But hunger had a way of breaking strength.
Slowly he knelt beside the ruined sandwich.
Maybe some part could still be saved.
Maybe—
A shadow fell over him.
Ethan looked up.
A young girl stood there.
About the same age as him.
Blonde hair tied neatly into a ponytail.
Perfect school uniform.
Polished shoes.
A pink backpack decorated with stars.
She looked at the ruined sandwich.
Then at Ethan.
Her eyes softened.
"What happened?" she asked quietly.
Ethan immediately looked away.
He hated pity.
"It's nothing."
The girl glanced at the food on the ground.
"That was your lunch?"
Ethan didn't answer.
The silence told her everything.
She reached into her lunch bag.
Pulled out a fresh sandwich.
Turkey and cheese.
Perfectly wrapped.
She held it toward him.
"Here."
Ethan blinked.
"What?"
"You can have mine."
His eyes widened.
"No."
"It's okay."
"No, I can't."
The girl smiled gently.
"My name is Lily."
Ethan stared at the sandwich.
His stomach screamed at him to take it.
But pride fought back.
Lily moved closer.
"Please."
Ethan hesitated.
"Why would you do that?"
Lily shrugged.
"Because you're hungry."
The answer was so simple it almost hurt.
Nobody had treated Ethan kindly in a very long time.
People ignored him.
Mocked him.
Avoided him.
Yet this stranger acted as though helping someone was the most natural thing in the world.
Slowly he accepted the sandwich.
His hands shook.
"Thank you."
Lily smiled.
"You're welcome."
For the first time that morning Ethan felt something unfamiliar.
Hope.
Unfortunately, someone else had been watching.
And she was furious.
"LILY!"
The sharp voice echoed across the entrance.
Both children turned.
A woman stormed toward them.
Elegant.
Beautiful.
Perfectly dressed.
Her heels clicked angrily against the pavement.
This was Victoria Reynolds.
One of the wealthiest women in the city.
Lily's mother.
Her expression darkened as she approached.
"What are you doing?"
Lily's smile vanished.
"Mom—"
Victoria grabbed her daughter's arm.
"I asked you a question."
"I was just helping him."
Victoria looked Ethan up and down.
Disgust flashed across her face.
The reaction hit Ethan harder than any punch.
"I told you never to talk to strangers."
"He's just hungry."
"That isn't our problem."
Lily looked horrified.
"Mom..."
Victoria ignored her.
Instead she focused entirely on Ethan.
"Stay away from my daughter."
Ethan immediately stepped back.
"I wasn't bothering her."
"Then why are you here?"
The words cut deeply.
Because he already knew the answer.
Because people like her saw people like him as invisible.
Or worse.
Garbage.
Victoria pointed toward the street.
"Leave."
Lily protested.
"Mom, stop!"
Victoria's voice rose.
"I said leave."
Nearby parents began watching.
Students stopped walking.
Whispers spread.
Ethan felt dozens of eyes on him.
Humiliation flooded through his body.
He lowered his head.
"I'm sorry."
He turned to go.
Then Victoria noticed something.
A chain around Ethan's neck.
Hidden beneath his torn shirt.
A silver pendant.
Old.
Scratched.
Worn by time.
The pendant slipped into view as he moved.
Victoria froze.
Her eyes widened.
For a second all anger disappeared.
Only shock remained.
"Wait."
Ethan stopped.
Victoria stared at the necklace.
No.
Not the necklace.
The symbol engraved on it.
A small compass.
Her breathing changed.
"Where did you get that?"
Ethan instinctively grabbed the pendant.
"It's mine."
"Answer me."
The intensity in her voice startled everyone.
Lily looked confused.
"Mom?"
Victoria stepped closer.
"Where did you get that pendant?"
Ethan backed away.
"It belonged to my mother."
Victoria's face turned pale.
"Your mother?"
"Yes."
Victoria swallowed hard.
The world around her suddenly felt distant.
Because there was only one person she had ever known who owned a pendant exactly like that.
Only one.
A man she hadn't seen in eleven years.
A man named Mark.
The man who had vanished without explanation.
The man she once loved.
The man whose disappearance had destroyed countless lives.
Victoria stared at Ethan.
For the first time she truly looked at him.
His eyes.
His hair.
His face.
Something felt disturbingly familiar.
Something impossible.
Her heart began racing.
"Who are you?" she whispered.
Ethan frowned.
The question made no sense.
"I'm Ethan."
"No."
Victoria stepped forward.
"Who are you really?"
The crowd fell silent.
Lily looked from her mother to the boy.
Completely confused.
Victoria's hands trembled.
Because a terrifying possibility had entered her mind.
One she could barely comprehend.
If that pendant belonged to Mark...
And if Ethan inherited it from his mother...
Then who exactly was this boy?
Report this article
Select a reason for reporting:
Inaccurate information Copyright violation Spam / advertisement Offensive content Other
