"THE CHECKBOOK OF CHAOS": REPORT EXPOSES WHO IS FUNDING BEHIND MINNEAPOLIS ANTI-ICE RIOTS AS "LEGAL OBSERVER" NARRATIVE CRUMBLES
MINNEAPOLIS, MN — The mask has been ripped off the "resistance." What the mainstream media portrays as organic, grassroots protests against Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in Minnesota has now been revealed as a well-oiled machine funded by the deepest pockets of the radical left. A bombshell report confirms that organizations tied to billionaire George Soros are bankrolling the chaos on our streets.
The $7.8 Million Connection According to public records obtained by the New York Post, Indivisible Twin Cities—the group organizing many of the aggressive anti-ICE demonstrations—is linked to the Indivisible Project in Washington, D.C. The records show that Soros’ Open Society Foundations funneled a staggering $7,850,000 to the Indivisible Project between 2018 and 2023. This is not a neighborhood watch. This is a multi-million dollar operation designed to defeat the "Trump agenda" by any means necessary, including the physical obstruction of federal law enforcement.
The "Legal Observer" Myth The funding revelation comes as the narrative surrounding the death of Renee Nicole Good collapses. Leftist activists and groups like CAIR have tried to paint Good as a peaceful "legal observer" who was "killed in the line of observing." The reality on the ground tells a different story. Reports indicate Good was an "anti-ICE warrior" and a member of "ICE Watch," a radical group dedicated to stalking and stopping ICE raids. She was shot only after she allegedly used her vehicle to strike a federal agent—an act of lethal force, not observation.
The Radical Leadership The report exposes a roster of radical leaders coordinating these dangerous confrontations:
Jaylani Hussein (CAIR-MN): The executive director who screamed into a megaphone that federal agents were "lying" about the attack, stoking further division.
Nekima Levy Armstrong: A veteran of the 2020 George Floyd riots and founder of the Racial Justice Network. She organizes the so-called "legal observers" to film agents and recently blasted Governor Tim Walz for "retreating" in the face of the fraud scandal.
Edwin Torres DeSantiago: The first undocumented immigrant to receive a doctorate from the University of Minnesota, who leads the Immigrant Defense Network. He had the audacity to accuse President Trump of spreading "terror and chaos," while his group protects those breaking the law.
Legal Consequences Looming The fallout may extend beyond the streets to the courtroom. Fox News legal analyst Gregg Jarrett suggested that Renee Good’s spouse, Rebecca Good, could face serious criminal charges. “Aiding and abetting fleeing police with a domestic terrorism motive,” Jarrett theorized, noting that if evidence shows she encouraged the obstruction, she is complicit in the attack on federal officers.
The Big Picture This is a coordinated assault on the rule of law. With $7.8 million in Soros cash, a network of 90 nonprofits, and leaders who openly defy deportation orders, the "resistance" in Minneapolis is a professional insurgency disguised as civil rights activism. But with the Trump administration’s DOJ watching and the money trail now exposed, the question isn't if they will be stopped, but when.
'Guilty Of Fraud' - Hammer Dropped On Former First Lady Jill Biden During Live Fox News Segment
McEnany Accuses Jill Biden Of Misleading Americans About Debate Performance
Posted July 15, 2026
Former White House press secretary and Fox News host Kayleigh McEnany accused former first lady Jill Biden of misleading the American public about President Joe Biden’s condition following his widely criticized debate performance during the 2024 campaign.
McEnany made the remarks Thursday during an appearance on Fox News Channel’s “America’s Newsroom,” where she reacted to comments Jill Biden reportedly made in her upcoming book regarding the president’s performance during the debate that ultimately intensified questions about his age and fitness for office.
The discussion began when co-host Dana Perino referenced remarks Jill Biden made immediately following the debate.
At a campaign event after the debate, Jill Biden praised her husband’s performance.
“Joe, you did such a great job. You answered every question,” she said at the time.
Perino contrasted those comments with more recent claims attributed to Jill Biden and raised questions about the apparent inconsistency.
“So now we know that this is what she’s saying in her book,” Perino said. “And the question I would love to ask her is where are you lying then or now?”
McEnany responded by arguing that Jill Biden’s reaction following the debate was inconsistent with her more recent descriptions of the event.
“It’s a great question,” McEnany said.
“That is not the reaction of someone who believes they just watched their husband have a stroke. It is an absolute lie.”
McEnany then accused the former first lady of concealing concerns about the president’s condition from voters.
“It was fraud,” she said.
“What she did fraud on the American public and she’s continuing it by saying she had never seen him like that before or after.”
The debate between Biden and President Donald Trump became a turning point in the 2024 election cycle, with many Democrats publicly expressing concern about Biden’s performance and his ability to continue his campaign.
Questions about Biden’s age and mental sharpness had circulated for years, but the debate intensified those concerns and fueled calls from some Democrats for him to step aside.
During the Fox News discussion, McEnany referenced comments previously made by veteran journalist Carl Bernstein regarding Biden’s condition behind the scenes.
“Dana, you all remember Carl Bernstein, who said he talked to people who knew Joe Biden, loved Joe Biden, supported Joe Biden, and they were adamant that what we saw was not a one-off,” McEnany said.
According to McEnany, Bernstein reported that individuals close to Biden had observed similar episodes before the debate.
“They said it had happened 15 or 20 times prior, him losing his train of thought,” she said.
McEnany also cited a fundraiser Bernstein reportedly described.
“He described a fundraiser where he froze up and seemed to have some type of rigor mortis,” she said.
“This is not something that was a one-off.”
McEnany argued that concerns about Biden’s condition were widely known among those close to him.
“This was well known,” she said.
She then questioned why Jill Biden continued publicly defending her husband following the debate.
“So why did she keep up with the fraud on the American people?” McEnany asked.
The former first lady has repeatedly defended her husband and rejected claims that she or members of his inner circle concealed concerns about his health, Breitbart News reported.
The debate over Biden’s condition became one of the defining political stories of the 2024 election cycle and continued after he ultimately left the race.
McEnany’s comments reflect ongoing scrutiny surrounding what Biden’s family, advisers and top Democratic officials knew about his condition and when they knew it.
Neither Jill Biden nor representatives for the former president immediately responded to McEnany’s latest remarks.
As new books and accounts from those involved continue to emerge, questions surrounding Biden’s final campaign and the decisions made by those closest to him remain a major topic of political debate.
