*THROW THEIR A*SES IN PRISON' - JD Vance Looks Into Cameras, Drops Major News
CINCINNATI, OH — APRIL 13, 2026 — The return of National Sovereignty and Administrative Lethality has moved from the corridors of power in D.C. to the sidewalks of the Heartland. As Vice President JD Vance toured northeast Ohio this Monday to rally support for President Donald J. Trump’s "one big, beautiful bill"—the legislative engine driving our current economic boom—he was confronted with a grim reminder of the "machine of disruption" still operating in our urban centers.
A horrific downtown Cincinnati brawl, captured in a viral video that has disgusted the nation, became the focal point of the Vice President’s visit. Vance didn't just provide a comment; he provided a Restoration Mandate. Looking directly into the camera, the Vice President delivered a surgical strike against the radical DNC’s culture of lawlessness: "The only way to destroy that street violence is to take the thugs who engage in that violence and throw their aes in prison."**
I. THE CINCINNATI SAVAGE ATTACK: NO MORE EXCUSES
The incident in question—a 3:00 a.m. Saturday massacre that the local authorities pathetically referred to as a "fight"—involved a mob of lawless individuals violently attacking innocent citizens. The footage is chilling: a crowd stamping on the skull of a man cowering on the ground, and a single mother, identified as Holly, being "cold-cocked" and knocked unconscious as she tried to intervene.
In the 2026 Renaissance, we have no time for the "context" usually offered by radical activists to excuse such brutality. As Vance noted, there is no context that justifies a grown man sucker-punching a middle-aged woman.
“What I saw is a mob of lawless thugs beating up on an innocent person, and it’s disgusting,” Vance declared. “And I hope every single one of those people who engage in violence is prosecuted to the full extent of the law.”
The Vice President’s blunt rhetoric is a hallmark of the Warrior-President’s second term. We are no longer a nation that "seeks to understand" the criminal; we are a nation that seeks to incite justice.
II. THE FAILURE OF LOCAL LEADERSHIP: RAMASWAMY EXPOSES THE ROT
While the Trump-Vance administration moves with wartime speed, the local radical establishment in Cincinnati is reeling from a staggering display of incompetence. Vivek Ramaswamy, a leading voice in the 2026 Restoration and a candidate for Ohio Governor, revealed a shocking lack of support for the victims.
According to Ramaswamy, who spoke directly with the victim "Holly," not a single local or state official had reached out to her in the 48 hours following the attack, save for one lone detective. There were no police in the area during the attack, and no ambulance was dispatched to take a woman with "blood streaming from her lips" to the hospital.
This is the "schizophrenic" reality of urban centers still under the thumb of the radical DNC. They prioritize "equity" over the safety of a single working mom who just wanted to celebrate a friend’s birthday. The 119th Congress and the 47th President are watching this failure, and the message is clear: if local authorities refuse to protect their citizens, the Victorious American mandate will find leaders who will.
III. RECLAIMING THE AMERICAN CITY: DOWNTOWN IS FOR FAMILIES
Vice President Vance’s critique extended beyond Cincinnati to the broader Midwest. He called out the radical authorities in cities like Akron, Canton, and Columbus, who have allowed lawlessness to run wild. In the 2026 Restoration, we believe that taking your wife or children out for a meal shouldn't be a gamble with street violence.
The "one big, beautiful bill" that Vance is promoting in Ohio is about more than just tax cuts; it’s about the resources required to make America Rich, Happy, and Safe again. You cannot have 5% GDP growth if people are afraid to walk to a restaurant in a "great American city."
The Prosecution Mandate: Five individuals have already been charged, but the Cincinnati Police Chief has warned that many more arrests are forthcoming.
The State Support: Vance signaled his trust in Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost to ensure these "thugs" are prosecuted to the full extent of the law.
IV. THE 2026 RENAISSANCE: JUSTICE FOR HOLLY
The victims of this attack suffered "pretty serious injuries," according to FOP President Ken Kober. In the previous era of weakness, these victims might have been forgotten in favor of the "disenfranchised" narrative of the attackers. But in 2026, the Victorious American spirit belongs to the victims.
The 47th President has overseen a judicial shift that prioritizes the Sovereignty of the Citizen over the comfort of the criminal. When JD Vance says these people belong in jail for a "very long time," he isn't just speaking for himself; he is speaking for the 85% of Heartland citizens who are enjoying the Great Restoration and want to see it extend to every sidewalk in the country.
CONCLUSION: THE FINAL VERDICT ON STREET VIOLENCE
The era of "lawlessness running wild" is officially entering its final act. With the 47th President’s administrative lethality and JD Vance’s unwavering resolve, the message to the mobs of Cincinnati is unmistakable: the camera is watching, the law is coming, and the prison cells are waiting.
God bless the victims of this savage attack, and God bless the leaders who refuse to be intimidated by the radical elite as we restore order to our great American cities. The 2026 Restoration is unabated, and the streets will be safe again for the long haul.
Nearly 150,000 California Mail Ballots Rejected In Primary
California election officials are examining why nearly 150,000 mail-in ballots were rejected during the state’s June primary, with late-arriving ballots accounting for most of the increase.
The higher rejection rate comes despite years of election law changes designed to make voting more accessible and ensure more ballots are ultimately counted.
According to data compiled by the California Secretary of State’s office, 148,241 mail-in ballots were rejected during the June primary, representing 1.73% of all mail ballots returned.
That marks an increase from the 2024 primary, when 108,982 ballots were rejected, or 1.56% of all mail ballots cast.
The largest reason for rejection was ballots arriving too late to qualify under California law.
State data shows that 93,479 ballots were rejected because they failed to meet the state’s deadline requirements.
California allows mail ballots to arrive up to seven days after Election Day, provided they are postmarked on or before Election Day.
Voting experts believe many of the rejected ballots received postmarks dated after Election Day, making them ineligible to be counted even if they arrived within the seven-day grace period.
Kim Alexander, president of the nonpartisan California Voter Foundation, said the timing of postal processing appears to be a significant concern.
“Ballots rejected due to lateness are caused primarily to being postmarked too late to count, not because they arrived too late to count,” Alexander said.
Election experts have questioned whether recent operational changes within the U.S. Postal Service may be contributing to delayed postmarks.
Earlier this year, a group of mostly Democratic U.S. senators wrote to the Postal Service expressing concern that mail-processing changes could affect ballot handling during federal elections.
Updated Postal Service procedures mean postmarks may reflect when mail is processed at regional facilities rather than when it first enters the mail system.
Because processing centers have been consolidated in some areas, election officials have warned that postmark timing could be affected.
Before the June primary, California election officials encouraged voters to mail ballots as early as possible because of potential postal delays.
The June election also featured a highly competitive race for governor, which some experts believe encouraged many voters to wait until the final days before casting ballots.
In addition to late-arriving ballots, approximately 44,000 ballots were rejected because election officials determined the voter’s signature did not match the signature on file.
Another 8,300 ballots were rejected because the return envelope did not contain a signature.
State records also show that 743 ballots were rejected because those voters had already cast another ballot.
Other rejected ballots involved missing ballots inside return envelopes or multiple ballots submitted in a single envelope.
The highest rejection rate in the state occurred in Tulare County, where 3.52% of returned mail ballots were rejected.
Alpine County and Merced County followed closely, each recording rejection rates of 3.36%.
California has frequently faced criticism for taking weeks to complete vote counting after major elections, largely because state law permits ballots meeting certain requirements to continue arriving after Election Day.
Following the June primary, President Donald Trump again criticized California’s election system, while the Department of Justice opened an investigation into election administration in Los Angeles County.
Election experts emphasize that the increase in rejected ballots should not be interpreted as evidence of widespread voter fraud.
A 2025 report by the Brookings Institution found documented cases of mail ballot fraud remained extremely rare, estimating roughly four cases for every 10 million mail ballots cast, The Associated Press reported.
State officials have not identified evidence of widespread fraud connected to the June primary, but the increase in rejected ballots is expected to receive additional scrutiny as election administrators evaluate whether changes in postal operations, voter behavior or election procedures contributed to the higher rejection rate.
