Trump Chastises UK For Too-Late Decision to Join Iran Strikes
President Donald Trump took a sharp jab at Britain on Saturday, labeling the nation a “once great ally” while voicing intense frustration with the left-wing Labour government in London. The critique stems from Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s initial refusal to permit U.S. forces to use British bases for the ongoing conflict in Iran.
The "special relationship" between the United Kingdom and the United States has faced significant strain as Starmer’s administration was notably outpaced by France in delivering swift military responses. While reports indicate that the HMS Prince of Wales is finally preparing for deployment to the Middle East, the President made it clear he was unimpressed by the timing.
"We Don't Need Them Any Longer"
In a scathing post on Truth Social, President Trump ridiculed the belated British response, suggesting that the U.S. had already secured the necessary momentum without London's early assistance.
“The United Kingdom, our once Great Ally... is finally giving serious thought to sending two aircraft carriers to the Middle East," Trump wrote. "That’s OK, Prime Minister Starmer, we don’t need them any longer — But we will remember. We don’t need people that join Wars after we’ve already won!”
Former British Prime Minister Liz Truss echoed these sentiments, describing Trump’s comments as “justified and damning.” Although Starmer eventually backtracked to allow U.S. access to bases for “defensive” actions, the shift has done little to repair ties with the White House.
The Churchill Comparison and Chagos Conflict
During a recent Oval Office meeting with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, President Trump reportedly mocked Starmer’s legalistic approach to military requests. Trump pointed out that Starmer, a former human rights lawyer, seemed more concerned with international law than the responsibility to protect citizens from Iran-supported terrorism.
“This is not Winston Churchill that we’re dealing with,” Trump remarked.
Relations have further soured due to Starmer’s decision to cede control of the Chagos Islands to Mauritius. Trump has condemned the move—which jeopardizes the strategically vital UK-U.S. base on Diego Garcia—as a “blight” on Britain’s reputation and a symptom of “wokeism.”
May you like
IT'S OVER: First Democrat Resigns - Jeffrey Epstein Fallout ERUPTS!
PANIC IN DC — Top Democrat Senator FLIPS and Becomes Republican
Person asked AI to predict the next bombshell in the Epstein files and got a chilling response
Russia’s Indirect Involvement
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt addressed reports that Russia has been supplying Iran with intelligence to target American forces. While acknowledging the reports, Leavitt maintained that the U.S. military remains dominant.
“It clearly is not making a difference... because we are completely decimating them,” Leavitt told reporters. She emphasized that while Moscow may be sharing location data of U.S. forces with Tehran, it would not undermine President Trump’s broader efforts to secure a peace deal in the Russia-Ukraine conflict.
Leavitt highlighted that Russia and Ukraine had successfully conducted a prisoner exchange as recently as Thursday, noting that the administration still views regional peace as an achievable objective despite the rising tensions in the Middle East.
Israel: 2 Top Iranian Officials Killed in Airstrikes
TEL AVIV, ISRAEL — The command structure of the Iranian theocracy suffered a crippling blow overnight as Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz confirmed the elimination of two of the country’s most powerful figures. Ali Larijani, a top strategic advisor and former parliamentary speaker, and Gen. Gholam Reza Soleimani, head of the brutal Basij militia, were both killed in a "wide-scale wave of strikes" across Tehran.
The deaths mark a significant escalation in the conflict that began on February 28, 2026. This operation, supported by the Trump administration, has already seen the death of 86-year-old Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and continues to target the core of the Iranian leadership.
The Targets: Strategy and Suppression
The IDF's precision strikes took out individuals essential to both Iran's international strategy and internal control:
Ali Larijani: A scion of a famous political dynasty, Larijani was the senior advisor to the late Khamenei and a key figure in nuclear negotiations. His death leaves a massive void in the Supreme National Security Council.
Gen. Gholam Reza Soleimani: As the head of the Basij militia, Soleimani led the violent repression of domestic dissent. He was under heavy international sanctions for his role in widespread arrests and the use of force against civilian demonstrators.
“The armed apparatus of the Iranian terror regime is being dismantled piece by piece,” stated Minister Katz.
Regional Escalation: The Gulf Under Fire
In a desperate retaliation, Tehran launched salvos of drones and missiles at its neighbors and Israel, causing chaos across the Middle East:
Dubai Airspace Closure: A major travel hub, Dubai briefly shut its airspace as incoming missiles were intercepted. In Abu Dhabi, one man was killed by falling debris—the eighth fatality in the UAE since the war's inception.
Energy Infrastructure Hits: Iran targeted a fuel facility in Fujairah and hit a tanker anchored off the UAE coast.
Saudi Arabia & Qatar: Saudi defenses intercepted a dozen drones over its Eastern Province, while Qatar thwarted a missile attack on its capital, though downed projectiles caused fires in an industrial zone.
-
Baghdad Embassy: The U.S. Embassy in Baghdad’s "Green Zone" successfully intercepted four drones, though shrapnel fell on the facility.
Global Energy Crisis and the Hormuz Standoff
The virtual shutdown of the Strait of Hormuz is sending shockwaves through the global economy. A fifth of the world's oil is currently at risk, leading to:
Surging Prices: Brent crude has climbed over $100 a barrel, a 40% increase since the conflict began.
Trump's Naval Ultimatum: President Donald Trump has demanded that allied nations send warships to reopen the strait, though many remain hesitant to enter a war with "no defined exit plan."
Food & Economic Stability: Central banks worldwide are warning that energy spikes are complicating efforts to curb inflation and could lead to food shortages in developing nations.
The Human Toll
The conflict’s intensity has reached a fever pitch, with casualties mounting on all sides:
Iran: Over 1,300 reported dead amid round-the-clock airstrikes and internet outages.
Lebanon: 850 dead and over 1 million people (20% of the population) displaced as Israel targets Hezbollah.
Israel & U.S.: 12 people killed in Israel by Iranian fire; 13 U.S. military members have been confirmed killed in action.
As Israeli troops reinforce the northern border, Lt. Gen. Eyal Zamir reaffirmed that the military is "determined to deepen the operation" until all strategic objectives are achieved.
Nearly 150,000 California Mail Ballots Rejected In Primary
California election officials are examining why nearly 150,000 mail-in ballots were rejected during the state’s June primary, with late-arriving ballots accounting for most of the increase.
The higher rejection rate comes despite years of election law changes designed to make voting more accessible and ensure more ballots are ultimately counted.
According to data compiled by the California Secretary of State’s office, 148,241 mail-in ballots were rejected during the June primary, representing 1.73% of all mail ballots returned.
That marks an increase from the 2024 primary, when 108,982 ballots were rejected, or 1.56% of all mail ballots cast.
The largest reason for rejection was ballots arriving too late to qualify under California law.
State data shows that 93,479 ballots were rejected because they failed to meet the state’s deadline requirements.
California allows mail ballots to arrive up to seven days after Election Day, provided they are postmarked on or before Election Day.
Voting experts believe many of the rejected ballots received postmarks dated after Election Day, making them ineligible to be counted even if they arrived within the seven-day grace period.
Kim Alexander, president of the nonpartisan California Voter Foundation, said the timing of postal processing appears to be a significant concern.
“Ballots rejected due to lateness are caused primarily to being postmarked too late to count, not because they arrived too late to count,” Alexander said.
Election experts have questioned whether recent operational changes within the U.S. Postal Service may be contributing to delayed postmarks.
Earlier this year, a group of mostly Democratic U.S. senators wrote to the Postal Service expressing concern that mail-processing changes could affect ballot handling during federal elections.
Updated Postal Service procedures mean postmarks may reflect when mail is processed at regional facilities rather than when it first enters the mail system.
Because processing centers have been consolidated in some areas, election officials have warned that postmark timing could be affected.
Before the June primary, California election officials encouraged voters to mail ballots as early as possible because of potential postal delays.
The June election also featured a highly competitive race for governor, which some experts believe encouraged many voters to wait until the final days before casting ballots.
In addition to late-arriving ballots, approximately 44,000 ballots were rejected because election officials determined the voter’s signature did not match the signature on file.
Another 8,300 ballots were rejected because the return envelope did not contain a signature.
State records also show that 743 ballots were rejected because those voters had already cast another ballot.
Other rejected ballots involved missing ballots inside return envelopes or multiple ballots submitted in a single envelope.
The highest rejection rate in the state occurred in Tulare County, where 3.52% of returned mail ballots were rejected.
Alpine County and Merced County followed closely, each recording rejection rates of 3.36%.
California has frequently faced criticism for taking weeks to complete vote counting after major elections, largely because state law permits ballots meeting certain requirements to continue arriving after Election Day.
Following the June primary, President Donald Trump again criticized California’s election system, while the Department of Justice opened an investigation into election administration in Los Angeles County.
Election experts emphasize that the increase in rejected ballots should not be interpreted as evidence of widespread voter fraud.
A 2025 report by the Brookings Institution found documented cases of mail ballot fraud remained extremely rare, estimating roughly four cases for every 10 million mail ballots cast, The Associated Press reported.
State officials have not identified evidence of widespread fraud connected to the June primary, but the increase in rejected ballots is expected to receive additional scrutiny as election administrators evaluate whether changes in postal operations, voter behavior or election procedures contributed to the higher rejection rate.
