Trump WINS! Shocking Appeals Court Ruling in E. Jean Carroll Case

WASHINGTON, D.C. — A federal appeals court has ruled that President Donald Trump is not required to pay an $83 million defamation judgment awarded to writer E. Jean Carroll while the case awaits further review by the U.S. Supreme Court. The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New York issued the order on Monday after Trump’s legal team requested a pause on an earlier appellate decision that had denied him the opportunity to seek rehearing before the full court.
The appeals court granted the stay on the condition that Trump increase the existing bond by $7.46 million to account for accruing interest on the award during the anticipated proceedings. With the adjustment, the total bond now exceeds $91 million. Attorneys for Carroll confirmed there was no objection to the stay provided the bond was increased.
Carroll’s attorney, Roberta Kaplan, stated that the legal team was satisfied with the condition requiring the additional bond. Trump’s attorneys have been pursuing a separate legal strategy that would substitute the U.S. government as the defendant in the defamation lawsuit. If successful, the move could potentially resolve the case because the federal government is generally immune from defamation claims under existing law.

The underlying case stems from a 2024 jury verdict in which Carroll prevailed on claims that Trump defamed her by denying allegations of sexual abuse in a Bergdorf Goodman dressing room during the 1990s. Trump has consistently denied the accusations, describing the case as a “complete con job” and stating that Carroll was “not my type.” His legal team has argued that the allegations were politically motivated and lacked corroborating evidence such as physical proof, eyewitness testimony, or contemporaneous police reports. They have also highlighted that Carroll waited more than two decades to make the claims public.
Trump is separately seeking Supreme Court review of a related $5 million judgment in another defamation case brought by Carroll. The Supreme Court is expected to consider petitions involving that matter during its private conference. In filings, Trump’s attorneys described Carroll’s account as “facially implausible” and contended that certain evidentiary rulings during the trial were improper.
The appeals court’s decision to grant the stay provides temporary relief for Trump while higher court proceedings continue. Legal observers note that such stays are not uncommon in high-profile civil cases involving public figures when significant constitutional or procedural questions are raised. The developments reflect ongoing litigation stemming from Carroll’s 2019 book in which she first publicly detailed the allegations against Trump.
The case has drawn national attention as part of broader discussions about defamation law, presidential immunity, and the intersection of politics and civil litigation. Supporters of Trump have described the lawsuits as examples of politically motivated legal actions, while Carroll’s legal team has maintained that the verdicts were based on evidence presented at trial and upheld through the appellate process.
As the matter heads toward potential Supreme Court consideration, both sides continue to prepare arguments on the merits of the underlying claims and the procedural steps taken thus far. The outcome could have implications not only for the parties involved but also for future cases addressing similar issues of defamation and official conduct.
The ruling comes amid a series of legal challenges facing the Trump administration as it advances its policy agenda. Legal experts anticipate additional filings and potential further appeals as the case progresses through the federal court system. No timeline has been set for Supreme Court action, though the high court typically issues orders on certiorari petitions within weeks of its conferences.
The developments are being closely monitored by legal analysts and political observers as they unfold against the backdrop of ongoing national debates over civil liability, free speech, and the role of the judiciary in high-profile disputes.
Acting AG Blanche Fires Back at Obama’s DOJ Criticism

Acting AG Blanche Fires Back at Obama’s DOJ Criticism
Posted July 21, 2026
Former President Barack Obama sharply criticized the Trump administration this week over what he described as growing political influence inside the United States Department of Justice, prompting an aggressive response from Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche defending both the administration’s prosecutions and President Donald Trump’s authority over the executive branch.
The escalating public dispute comes as the Justice Department faces mounting scrutiny over a series of criminal investigations and indictments involving several longtime Trump critics and political adversaries, including former FBI Director James Comey.
Obama raised the issue during an interview with Stephen Colbert on CBS’ The Late Show with Stephen Colbert that aired Monday night.
“The White House shouldn’t be able to direct the attorney general to go around prosecuting whoever,” Obama said during the interview. “The idea is that the attorney general is the people’s lawyer. It’s not the president’s consigliere.”
Obama suggested the principle of DOJ independence may ultimately need to be codified into law by Congress, arguing that the justice system risks becoming politicized if presidents are perceived as directly targeting political opponents through federal prosecutions.
The comments immediately triggered pushback from the Trump administration.
White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson accused Obama of hypocrisy, arguing that his administration played a central role in the origins of the Trump-Russia investigation.
“Barack Hussein Obama is the king of weaponization,” Jackson said in a statement, referencing declassified documents related to the FBI’s Russia probe.
But the administration’s most extensive response came Wednesday from Blanche during an interview with CBS News in Phoenix.
Blanche forcefully rejected accusations that the DOJ is engaged in political retaliation and defended the president’s constitutional authority over the executive branch.
“Article Two says, ‘the executive power shall be vested in the President of the United States of America,’” Blanche said while holding a pocket copy of the Constitution during the interview. “It does not say that the Attorney General stands off to the side.”
Blanche emphasized that the attorney general serves within the executive branch and argued that presidents are fully entitled to direct priorities involving law enforcement, immigration, drugs, and national security.
“To the extent that President Trump calls me and says that he thinks we have a problem in this country, whether it’s the scourge of drugs, illegal immigration, every American wants him to do that,” Blanche said. “And he should.”
The acting attorney general also dismissed accusations that the DOJ is pursuing politically motivated cases against Trump critics.
“We are absolutely doing nothing but what we should be doing at the Department of Justice,” Blanche said. “I wake up with a very clean conscience every morning.”
The public clash comes amid multiple high-profile investigations involving Trump adversaries.
Most notably, Comey was recently indicted after prosecutors alleged a 2025 Instagram post featuring seashells arranged to form the numbers “86 47” constituted a threat against Trump, the 47th president. Prosecutors argue “86” is commonly understood slang meaning “to eliminate” or “get rid of.”
Blanche defended the case, arguing threats against the president must be treated seriously given recent assassination attempts and escalating political extremism.
Last year, Trump publicly urged then-Attorney General Pam Bondi to pursue prosecutions against Comey, James, and Sen. Adam Schiff, writing on social media that “JUSTICE MUST BE SERVED.”
Blanche declined to discuss private conversations with Trump when asked whether the president personally directed prosecutions.
“But rest assured,” Blanche said, “he has much better, bigger and important things to do than to worry about me doing my job.”
Blanche also turned Democrats’ criticism back against them by pointing to the multiple criminal prosecutions Trump himself faced before returning to office, including cases brought by state prosecutors in New York and Georgia as well as federal investigations overseen by Special Counsel Jack Smith.
“So I welcome criticism. Let’s go,” Blanche said. “But if you’re sitting in a glass house, you ought not throw stones.”
Report this article
Select a reason for reporting:
Inaccurate information Copyright violation Spam / advertisement Offensive content OtherComments 0
Posting as GuestTHE CAR DEALER MOCKED THE GREASE-COVERED BOY

PART ONE — THE BOY ON THE HOOD
“Kid, do you honestly think you know anything about cars?”
The question echoed through the most expensive showroom in Dallas.
Mason Caldwell leaned toward the grease-covered eleven-year-old sitting on the hood of a black supercar and laughed loudly enough for the customers to hear.
Eli Carter did not look like someone who belonged beneath the crystal lights of Caldwell Sterling Motors.
His blue mechanic’s coveralls were stained with oil. His sneakers were worn at the toes, and a dark streak of grease ran across one side of his face. His hands were small, but the calluses along his fingers came from real tools, not toys.
Mason looked entirely at home.
He wore a custom gray suit, polished Italian shoes, and a watch worth more than most of the vehicles parked outside. As director of the company’s flagship showroom, he had spent years perfecting the expression of a man who could decide whether another person deserved to remain in the room.
The car beneath Eli was called the Aegis X1.
Only one existed.

Its carbon-fiber body reflected the showroom lights like black glass. The electric performance system had been developed in secret, and the vehicle was expected to sell for more than two million dollars after its official unveiling.
Employees had been warned not to touch it without authorization.
Mason pointed toward the floor.
“Get off the car before your father spends the rest of his life paying for the fingerprints.”
Eli remained still.
“My father is dead.”
For half a second, several employees stopped smiling.
Mason’s expression barely changed.
“Then find whichever mechanic brought you inside.”
A few salespeople laughed nervously.
They did not find the joke funny.
They laughed because Mason noticed people who did not.
Eli looked around the showroom.
Customers stood near luxury sedans and limited-edition sports cars. Several had already raised their phones to record the confrontation.
Mason enjoyed the attention.
He stepped closer.
“You know what happens to people who touch things they cannot afford?”
Eli slowly removed one dirty glove.
He placed it on the Aegis’s hood.
“I know enough to understand that you’re about to have a very bad day.”
The laughter ended.
Mason’s face tightened.
“You have five seconds to get down.”
Eli reached into the pocket of his coveralls and removed a sleek black key fob.
It carried no manufacturer’s logo.
Only a small silver symbol shaped like a shield.
Mason recognized it immediately.
“That key doesn’t belong to you.”
Eli pressed the upper button.
The Aegis’s headlights came alive.
A second later, the vehicle’s electric system produced a deep synthetic growl that rolled through the showroom floor.
Mason stumbled backward.
A woman near the reception desk gasped.
The car had not yet been publicly activated.
Only four people were supposed to possess functioning authorization keys.
Mason grabbed Eli’s wrist.
“Where did you steal that?”
“Take your hand off him.”
The voice came from the showroom entrance.
An older man stood between the glass doors with two attorneys, the company’s chief engineer, and a pair of federal investigators behind him.
Henry Carter was seventy-one.
His silver hair was neatly combed, and he wore a dark blue suit without a tie. Age had bent his shoulders slightly, but nothing had weakened the authority in his voice.
Forty-two years earlier, Henry had built the first Carter performance engine inside a rented machine shop.
The company now employed more than six thousand people.
Mason released Eli immediately.
“Mr. Carter.”
Henry looked at the red handprint forming around his grandson’s wrist.
Then he looked at Mason.
“My grandson spent the morning helping our engineers inspect this prototype.”
Mason’s face lost color.
“Your grandson?”
Eli climbed down from the hood.
“My father designed the Aegis drive-control system before he died.”
Henry rested one hand on Eli’s shoulder.
“Lucas Carter also left his controlling shares to his son.”
Mason stared at the boy.
The child he had just humiliated owned a larger percentage of Carter Automotive than any current executive.
But Eli was not smiling because of the inheritance.
He opened the driver’s door and reached beneath the dashboard.
When he pulled his hand back, he was holding a recording device no larger than a pack of gum.
“I found this connected to the diagnostic port.”
Dr. Priya Shah, Carter Automotive’s chief engineer, stepped forward and examined it.
Her expression changed immediately.
“This is not a tracking unit.”
“What is it?” Henry asked.
“A data siphon. It has been copying prototype software every time the system powers on.”
Henry turned toward Mason.
“You told the board our design files were stolen through a foreign cyberattack.”
Mason’s mouth opened.
“I can explain.”
Eli pressed another button on the key fob.
The Aegis’s speakers activated.
Mason’s voice filled the showroom.
“Sell the software before the launch. Once Carter’s stock falls, Northstar purchases the company for nothing.”
Phones turned toward Mason.
A sales manager stepped away from him.
One of the federal investigators moved closer.
Mason lunged toward Eli.
The second investigator blocked him.
Henry did not raise his voice.
“You asked whether the boy knew anything about cars.”
He looked at the recording device.
“My grandson knew enough to discover what every adult in this showroom was too frightened to report.”
Mason’s confidence disappeared.
Then Eli climbed into the driver’s seat and opened the prototype’s diagnostic records.
A hidden file appeared on the central display.
It showed that Mason had not merely copied the vehicle’s software.
Someone had entered the Aegis control system the previous night and disabled the emergency braking response before a scheduled high-speed test.
The driver assigned to perform that test was listed at the bottom of the screen.
HENRY CARTER.
Henry stared at his name.
Eli looked up at his grandfather.
“He wasn’t only trying to steal the company.”
Then he turned toward Mason.
“He was trying to inherit it.”
One investigator reached for Mason’s arm.
Before he could place him in handcuffs, a woman’s voice cut across the showroom.
“No one is arresting anybody.”
Every employee became still.
Margaret Carter descended the curved staircase overlooking the showroom.
She was sixty-eight, elegant, and dressed in a cream-colored suit. A silver Carter emblem rested at her collar.
To the public, Margaret was the graceful wife who had stood beside Henry from the company’s earliest years.
Inside the corporation, she was vice chair of the board.
To Eli, she was Grandma Margaret.
She had attended every Christmas dinner, mailed birthday cards, and cried at Lucas’s funeral.
Now she held a second Aegis key fob in her hand.
Henry stared at her.
“Margaret, step away from the security controls.”
She looked at Eli instead.
“I warned Mason that the boy was too much like his father.”
Eli’s breathing stopped.
Margaret pressed the lower button.
Metal security shutters dropped across the showroom’s glass doors.
Every exit locked.
The crystal lights dimmed.
The Aegis display went black.
Customers began shouting.
Margaret’s eyes remained on her grandson.
“Lucas never knew when to stop asking questions either.”